"Sex education has to do with what's in people's head"
About this Quote
Sex education, Donna Shalala implies, is less a curriculum than a battlefield of beliefs. The line is deceptively plain, but it does two strategic things at once: it reframes sex ed away from anatomy and toward psychology, and it signals that the real policy struggle is about culture, not bodies. “What’s in people’s head” points to desire, shame, misinformation, peer pressure, and the stories communities tell about gender and morality. It’s also a quiet rebuke to the notion that ignorance is protection.
Shalala’s background as a public servant gives the statement its particular intent. She isn’t pitching a philosophical theory; she’s arguing for governance that deals in outcomes. Teen pregnancy rates, STI prevention, consent, and coercion don’t shift because students can label diagrams. They shift when people can interpret situations, set boundaries, and separate myth from fact under social stress. The phrase “in people’s head” makes room for media literacy and power dynamics without name-checking them, a political advantage in a space where explicit language often triggers backlash.
The subtext is that opponents and proponents are fighting over narrative control: whether sex is framed as danger, sin, normal development, or health. Shalala’s wording also challenges the abstinence-only premise that information itself is corrupting. If the locus of harm is mental - confusion, stigma, silence - then withholding education starts to look less like restraint and more like negligence.
It works because it’s compact, humane, and hard to demonize: it asks listeners to consider the interior life of the student, not just the rules of the classroom.
Shalala’s background as a public servant gives the statement its particular intent. She isn’t pitching a philosophical theory; she’s arguing for governance that deals in outcomes. Teen pregnancy rates, STI prevention, consent, and coercion don’t shift because students can label diagrams. They shift when people can interpret situations, set boundaries, and separate myth from fact under social stress. The phrase “in people’s head” makes room for media literacy and power dynamics without name-checking them, a political advantage in a space where explicit language often triggers backlash.
The subtext is that opponents and proponents are fighting over narrative control: whether sex is framed as danger, sin, normal development, or health. Shalala’s wording also challenges the abstinence-only premise that information itself is corrupting. If the locus of harm is mental - confusion, stigma, silence - then withholding education starts to look less like restraint and more like negligence.
It works because it’s compact, humane, and hard to demonize: it asks listeners to consider the interior life of the student, not just the rules of the classroom.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Donna
Add to List


