"Sex is a doorway to something so powerful and mystical, but movies usually depict it in a completely flat way"
About this Quote
Lynch is poking at a peculiarly American failure of imagination: we have no problem selling sex, but we panic when it starts to mean anything. Calling sex a "doorway" is classic Lynchian metaphysics dressed up as plain speech. A doorway implies a threshold, a passage into altered perception - not just pleasure, but transformation. "Powerful and mystical" isn’t new-age mush in his hands; it’s a claim that sex can scramble identity, bend time, merge violence and tenderness, and expose the uncanny inside the everyday. That’s the real Lynch subject.
Then he turns the knife: "movies usually depict it in a completely flat way". Flat isn’t prudish; it’s literal, two-dimensional, hygienic. Mainstream sex scenes tend to function like plot punctuation (they hooked up; they’re bonded; someone’s compromised) or like softcore shorthand for adulthood. They’re often shot with the same visual grammar: flattering light, safe choreography, an edit that protects bodies from looking too human. The subtext is that cinema, a medium built to evoke dreams, routinely treats the most dreamlike human experience as mere content.
Context matters: Lynch’s work keeps returning to sex as a portal to doubles, secrets, and psychic rupture - Blue Velvet’s erotic menace, Mulholland Drive’s intimacy as both refuge and trap, Twin Peaks: The Return’s sex as cosmic event and trauma trigger. He’s arguing for an erotic cinema that’s less about showing and more about unsettling: sex as atmosphere, consequence, and metaphysical risk, not just a scene you fast-forward past or use to prove a film is "grown-up."
Then he turns the knife: "movies usually depict it in a completely flat way". Flat isn’t prudish; it’s literal, two-dimensional, hygienic. Mainstream sex scenes tend to function like plot punctuation (they hooked up; they’re bonded; someone’s compromised) or like softcore shorthand for adulthood. They’re often shot with the same visual grammar: flattering light, safe choreography, an edit that protects bodies from looking too human. The subtext is that cinema, a medium built to evoke dreams, routinely treats the most dreamlike human experience as mere content.
Context matters: Lynch’s work keeps returning to sex as a portal to doubles, secrets, and psychic rupture - Blue Velvet’s erotic menace, Mulholland Drive’s intimacy as both refuge and trap, Twin Peaks: The Return’s sex as cosmic event and trauma trigger. He’s arguing for an erotic cinema that’s less about showing and more about unsettling: sex as atmosphere, consequence, and metaphysical risk, not just a scene you fast-forward past or use to prove a film is "grown-up."
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List



