"Silences between movements are employed only in order to bring the opposing duo to the fore"
About this Quote
For Elliott Carter, silence isn’t a pause for polite applause; it’s a piece of stagecraft. Coming from a composer obsessed with temporal friction and musical “characters,” this line reads like a technical note with a philosophical sting: the break between movements is not neutral space. It’s a spotlight cue.
Carter’s music often treats the ensemble as a small society of competing agents, each with its own tempo, contour, and psychological profile. So when he talks about an “opposing duo,” he’s not describing mere instrumentation; he’s describing a conflict he wants you to feel as the work’s engine. The silence becomes the seam where the listener’s memory resets and re-aims. It clears the palate so the next confrontation lands with sharper edges, like cutting to black before a tense dialogue scene.
There’s also a quiet polemic here against the classical concert habit of treating silence as etiquette. Carter repurposes that culturally coded hush into structure: the audience’s held breath becomes part of the composition’s pacing, a controlled suspension that heightens the sense of inevitability when the music returns. In mid-to-late 20th-century modernism, where continuity could feel like a given and “form” was under renegotiation, Carter insists that segmentation can be dramatic rather than merely architectural.
Subtext: don’t listen for seamless beauty. Listen for forces, for argument, for the moment the air itself is used to frame a duel.
Carter’s music often treats the ensemble as a small society of competing agents, each with its own tempo, contour, and psychological profile. So when he talks about an “opposing duo,” he’s not describing mere instrumentation; he’s describing a conflict he wants you to feel as the work’s engine. The silence becomes the seam where the listener’s memory resets and re-aims. It clears the palate so the next confrontation lands with sharper edges, like cutting to black before a tense dialogue scene.
There’s also a quiet polemic here against the classical concert habit of treating silence as etiquette. Carter repurposes that culturally coded hush into structure: the audience’s held breath becomes part of the composition’s pacing, a controlled suspension that heightens the sense of inevitability when the music returns. In mid-to-late 20th-century modernism, where continuity could feel like a given and “form” was under renegotiation, Carter insists that segmentation can be dramatic rather than merely architectural.
Subtext: don’t listen for seamless beauty. Listen for forces, for argument, for the moment the air itself is used to frame a duel.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Elliott
Add to List
