"Similarly, today, we do not know what will happen as we wage the War on Terror. We do know that we can count on the strong support from our closest ally and friend in the world in winning this war to secure our freedoms and the freedoms for all peoples throughout the world"
About this Quote
Uncertainty gets framed as moral clarity here: we may not know what will happen, but we do know who we are, who our friends are, and what story we are supposed to be living inside. Kit Bond’s phrasing borrows the emotional grammar of World War II rhetoric - “wage,” “winning,” “secure our freedoms” - to turn an open-ended campaign into something that feels finite, righteous, and historically familiar.
The pivot from not knowing outcomes to knowing allegiance is the tell. In the early post-9/11 era, the War on Terror was both policy and persuasion, and this line does persuasion’s central job: it substitutes a stable relationship (“closest ally and friend”) for unstable facts on the ground. It reassures an anxious public that whatever the terrain - Afghanistan, Iraq, intelligence failures, civilian casualties - the West’s coalition will hold, and therefore the cause is legitimate.
“Freedoms for all peoples throughout the world” is the most ambitious clause, and the most strategically useful. It universalizes U.S. security concerns into a global liberation project, implying that dissent is not just disagreement about tactics but a refusal of freedom itself. Bond also quietly collapses distinctions between “our freedoms” and “the freedoms” as such, a rhetorical sleight of hand that makes American national interest synonymous with human emancipation.
Context matters: Bond, a Republican senator from Missouri, was speaking in a moment when solidarity with key allies (especially the U.K.) functioned as a seal of credibility for sweeping military and surveillance policies. The message isn’t only “we’ll win.” It’s “we’re not alone, so stop doubting.”
The pivot from not knowing outcomes to knowing allegiance is the tell. In the early post-9/11 era, the War on Terror was both policy and persuasion, and this line does persuasion’s central job: it substitutes a stable relationship (“closest ally and friend”) for unstable facts on the ground. It reassures an anxious public that whatever the terrain - Afghanistan, Iraq, intelligence failures, civilian casualties - the West’s coalition will hold, and therefore the cause is legitimate.
“Freedoms for all peoples throughout the world” is the most ambitious clause, and the most strategically useful. It universalizes U.S. security concerns into a global liberation project, implying that dissent is not just disagreement about tactics but a refusal of freedom itself. Bond also quietly collapses distinctions between “our freedoms” and “the freedoms” as such, a rhetorical sleight of hand that makes American national interest synonymous with human emancipation.
Context matters: Bond, a Republican senator from Missouri, was speaking in a moment when solidarity with key allies (especially the U.K.) functioned as a seal of credibility for sweeping military and surveillance policies. The message isn’t only “we’ll win.” It’s “we’re not alone, so stop doubting.”
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Kit
Add to List


