"Since Europe is dependent on imports of energy and most of its raw materials, it can be subdued, if not quite conquered, without all those nuclear weapons the Soviets have aimed at it simply through the shipping routes and raw materials they control"
About this Quote
The line lands like a cold audit of power: Europe’s vulnerability isn’t primarily military, it’s logistical. Amiel’s intent is to reframe the idea of “conquest” away from tanks and missiles and toward chokepoints, contracts, and cargo holds. The sneer embedded in “all those nuclear weapons” isn’t anti-defense so much as anti-fantasy: she’s puncturing the comforting notion that deterrence solves everything. If your lights, factories, and heating depend on someone else’s supply chain, you can be coerced without a shot fired.
The subtext is a critique of European strategic complacency and, implicitly, of elites who treat trade as a neutral, pacifying force. Amiel is pointing to the coercive underside of interdependence: the same system that delivers prosperity also delivers leverage. “Subdued, if not quite conquered” is carefully calibrated. She distinguishes between formal occupation and the quieter, more modern condition of constrained sovereignty, where policy options shrink under pressure from embargoes, price shocks, and targeted shortages.
Contextually, the quote sits in late-Cold War thinking about the Soviet bloc’s reach, but it also anticipates today’s debates about energy dependence, critical minerals, and maritime chokepoints. The argument isn’t that Europe is doomed; it’s that power has migrated. Control the routes and the inputs, and you can dictate terms while everyone pretends it’s just “market forces.” That’s the punch: coercion wearing a suit.
The subtext is a critique of European strategic complacency and, implicitly, of elites who treat trade as a neutral, pacifying force. Amiel is pointing to the coercive underside of interdependence: the same system that delivers prosperity also delivers leverage. “Subdued, if not quite conquered” is carefully calibrated. She distinguishes between formal occupation and the quieter, more modern condition of constrained sovereignty, where policy options shrink under pressure from embargoes, price shocks, and targeted shortages.
Contextually, the quote sits in late-Cold War thinking about the Soviet bloc’s reach, but it also anticipates today’s debates about energy dependence, critical minerals, and maritime chokepoints. The argument isn’t that Europe is doomed; it’s that power has migrated. Control the routes and the inputs, and you can dictate terms while everyone pretends it’s just “market forces.” That’s the punch: coercion wearing a suit.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Barbara
Add to List


