"Since it is seldom clear whether intellectual activity denotes a superior mode of being or a vital deficiency, opinion swings between considering intellect a privilege and seeing it as a handicap"
About this Quote
Barzun crystallizes a long cultural ambivalence about the life of the mind. Thinking can look like ascent, a way of living more fully through clarity, judgment, and imagination. It can also look like flight, a retreat from the urgencies of appetite, risk, and action. That tension makes the intellect appear alternately as a higher power and as a compensatory device for some missing vitality.
The Enlightenment tradition treats reason as a privilege: the faculty that frees us from superstition, underwrites science, and enables self-governance. By contrast, romantic and vitalist currents suspect that analysis drains experience of its sap, that to dissect is to deaden. Nietzsche called reason a late-blooming tool of the weak; Bergson set intelligence against intuition and elan vital. Psychoanalytic language likewise casts rationalization as a defense. Barzun stands at the crossroads of these traditions, especially in The House of Intellect, where he shows both the abuses of cleverness and the costs of anti-intellectual fervor.
The social theater reflects the oscillation. The absent-minded professor and the impractical genius are comic types precisely because intellect seems detached from life. Yet in other moments, credentials and expertise confer prestige and gatekeeping power, provoking resentment. Our era swings quickly: celebrate data-driven brilliance, then deride experts when their models falter; exalt disruptive coders, then demand earthy authenticity; prize critical theory, then blame it for sterility in the arts. The same mind that invents vaccines also produces bureaucratic jargon. Praise and suspicion feed each other.
Barzun’s formulation encourages sobriety. The intellect is neither halo nor hobble; it is an instrument that magnifies what is already there. When yoked to curiosity, sympathy, and courage, it elevates. When used as camouflage for timidity or as a cudgel for vanity, it enfeebles. A healthy culture neither worships nor scorns intellectual activity but binds it to practice, pleasure, and character, so that thinking becomes not an escape from life but a way of inhabiting it more intensely.
The Enlightenment tradition treats reason as a privilege: the faculty that frees us from superstition, underwrites science, and enables self-governance. By contrast, romantic and vitalist currents suspect that analysis drains experience of its sap, that to dissect is to deaden. Nietzsche called reason a late-blooming tool of the weak; Bergson set intelligence against intuition and elan vital. Psychoanalytic language likewise casts rationalization as a defense. Barzun stands at the crossroads of these traditions, especially in The House of Intellect, where he shows both the abuses of cleverness and the costs of anti-intellectual fervor.
The social theater reflects the oscillation. The absent-minded professor and the impractical genius are comic types precisely because intellect seems detached from life. Yet in other moments, credentials and expertise confer prestige and gatekeeping power, provoking resentment. Our era swings quickly: celebrate data-driven brilliance, then deride experts when their models falter; exalt disruptive coders, then demand earthy authenticity; prize critical theory, then blame it for sterility in the arts. The same mind that invents vaccines also produces bureaucratic jargon. Praise and suspicion feed each other.
Barzun’s formulation encourages sobriety. The intellect is neither halo nor hobble; it is an instrument that magnifies what is already there. When yoked to curiosity, sympathy, and courage, it elevates. When used as camouflage for timidity or as a cudgel for vanity, it enfeebles. A healthy culture neither worships nor scorns intellectual activity but binds it to practice, pleasure, and character, so that thinking becomes not an escape from life but a way of inhabiting it more intensely.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Jacques
Add to List
