"Since September 11th Congress has created the Department of Homeland Security, more than doubled the homeland security budget and implemented a bipartisan overhaul of our intelligence systems"
About this Quote
Post-9/11 governance loved to talk in verbs: created, doubled, implemented. Doc Hastings’ sentence is built like a progress report, and that’s the point. It doesn’t dwell on tragedy or fear; it converts national trauma into a ledger of institutional outputs, as if the right response to an open wound is a thicker binder and a bigger line item.
The intent is defensive and managerial. Hastings is not selling a particular bill so much as validating the entire post-9/11 security turn. By naming the Department of Homeland Security, the budget spike, and an “overhaul” of intelligence, he frames Congress as competent, active, and united. That “bipartisan” tag is doing heavy work: it signals legitimacy and inoculates the agenda against accusations of partisanship or overreach. If both sides signed off, the logic goes, the changes must be necessary.
The subtext is that scale equals safety. “More than doubled” is a brag disguised as reassurance, a promise that spending itself is a form of protection. Notice what’s missing: any mention of tradeoffs, civil liberties, mission creep, or whether the reforms actually worked. The sentence treats bureaucracy as an unambiguous good, and complexity as a marker of seriousness.
Context matters: Hastings came up in an era when being “tough on terror” was a baseline expectation for Republicans and many Democrats alike. In that climate, listing structural changes is a way to claim moral urgency without relitigating the messy questions: how much security is enough, and what gets quietly surrendered to pay for it.
The intent is defensive and managerial. Hastings is not selling a particular bill so much as validating the entire post-9/11 security turn. By naming the Department of Homeland Security, the budget spike, and an “overhaul” of intelligence, he frames Congress as competent, active, and united. That “bipartisan” tag is doing heavy work: it signals legitimacy and inoculates the agenda against accusations of partisanship or overreach. If both sides signed off, the logic goes, the changes must be necessary.
The subtext is that scale equals safety. “More than doubled” is a brag disguised as reassurance, a promise that spending itself is a form of protection. Notice what’s missing: any mention of tradeoffs, civil liberties, mission creep, or whether the reforms actually worked. The sentence treats bureaucracy as an unambiguous good, and complexity as a marker of seriousness.
Context matters: Hastings came up in an era when being “tough on terror” was a baseline expectation for Republicans and many Democrats alike. In that climate, listing structural changes is a way to claim moral urgency without relitigating the messy questions: how much security is enough, and what gets quietly surrendered to pay for it.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Doc
Add to List

