"So China will be having to make some choices as to whose side it wants to be on. Hopefully, this will be the beginning of a major improvement in our relationship with them, if they choose correctly"
About this Quote
Thompson’s line is diplomacy written in the grammar of an ultimatum: a smile stapled to a threat. The surface is “relationship improvement,” but the engine is coercion. “Having to make some choices” frames China’s agency as a reluctant necessity, not a sovereign right, while “whose side” shrinks a complex set of interests into a locker-room binary. It’s Cold War shorthand that turns foreign policy into team sports: pick the jersey, get the benefits.
The real tell is the conditional: “if they choose correctly.” Thompson doesn’t bother to define “correct,” because the audience is meant to supply it: align with U.S. priorities, endorse U.S. definitions of security, stop hedging, stop freelancing. The ambiguity is strategic. It lets the speaker sound open-handed while preserving the power to declare China wrong later, no matter what Beijing does. That’s how you keep the pressure on without committing to a specific demand that could be negotiated down.
Context matters. Thompson was a Republican senator and later a presidential contender in an era when China was becoming central to American anxieties: trade deficits, manufacturing decline, currency fights, and post-9/11 security alignments. The quote channels a domestic political need to look tough on an ascendant rival while still nodding to “engagement.” It’s less a message to Beijing than to American voters: we’re in charge, we set the terms, and the future is a test of loyalty. The irony is that this posture treats cooperation as a prize for obedience, which is a reliable way to make genuine cooperation harder.
The real tell is the conditional: “if they choose correctly.” Thompson doesn’t bother to define “correct,” because the audience is meant to supply it: align with U.S. priorities, endorse U.S. definitions of security, stop hedging, stop freelancing. The ambiguity is strategic. It lets the speaker sound open-handed while preserving the power to declare China wrong later, no matter what Beijing does. That’s how you keep the pressure on without committing to a specific demand that could be negotiated down.
Context matters. Thompson was a Republican senator and later a presidential contender in an era when China was becoming central to American anxieties: trade deficits, manufacturing decline, currency fights, and post-9/11 security alignments. The quote channels a domestic political need to look tough on an ascendant rival while still nodding to “engagement.” It’s less a message to Beijing than to American voters: we’re in charge, we set the terms, and the future is a test of loyalty. The irony is that this posture treats cooperation as a prize for obedience, which is a reliable way to make genuine cooperation harder.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Fred
Add to List

