"So I see that Christianity in believing in a Creator pulls together more facts, data, inner experience and ability than any mechanistic view could hold for me"
About this Quote
What’s doing the heavy lifting here is the phrase “pulls together.” Pike isn’t claiming Christianity wins because it’s prettier or more comforting; he’s making an integrative, almost methodological argument. In his framing, belief in a Creator functions like an explanatory architecture that can carry multiple kinds of evidence at once: “facts, data” (the public, supposedly objective stuff), “inner experience” (the private, stubbornly real phenomenology of being human), and even “ability” (a telling word that hints at agency, meaning-making, moral capacity, maybe even creativity). The mechanistic worldview, by contrast, is cast as a container with limited volume: it can store measurements, but not significance.
The subtext is a critique of 20th-century scientism from inside a social-scientific sensibility. Pike isn’t anti-empirical; he’s arguing that a purely mechanical account becomes thin precisely where humans are thick: consciousness, value, obligation, purpose. Notice the careful hedge: “for me.” That’s not timidity; it’s a strategic concession. He avoids pretending to deliver a lab result about God and instead positions faith as the better total model for his full range of lived evidence.
Context matters: a sociologist (and a century marked by behaviorism, systems theory, and “nothing-but” explanations) insisting that interior life is not a rounding error. The line reads like an intellectual refusing to amputate half of reality just to keep the theory tidy.
The subtext is a critique of 20th-century scientism from inside a social-scientific sensibility. Pike isn’t anti-empirical; he’s arguing that a purely mechanical account becomes thin precisely where humans are thick: consciousness, value, obligation, purpose. Notice the careful hedge: “for me.” That’s not timidity; it’s a strategic concession. He avoids pretending to deliver a lab result about God and instead positions faith as the better total model for his full range of lived evidence.
Context matters: a sociologist (and a century marked by behaviorism, systems theory, and “nothing-but” explanations) insisting that interior life is not a rounding error. The line reads like an intellectual refusing to amputate half of reality just to keep the theory tidy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List














