"So South Korean ability is very much limited to handle North Korean, you know, difficulties. So we don't want to see an immediate collapse of the North Korea regime"
About this Quote
A veteran democrat who spent years fighting dictatorship, Kim Dae Jung sounds almost clinical here, but the coldness is strategic. The line isn’t an apology for North Korea’s regime; it’s a warning about what happens when moral clarity collides with state capacity. “Ability is very much limited” is the key phrase: he’s lowering the temperature on triumphalist fantasies that treat collapse like a clean ending rather than the beginning of an emergency.
The intent is pragmatic deterrence. By stating South Korea can’t “handle” North Korean “difficulties,” Kim is speaking as a head of state responsible for budgets, borders, and lives. Collapse would mean famine logistics, refugees, loose weapons, criminal networks, and a sudden demand for unification at maximum speed. The subtext is that humanitarian disaster and security risk are not abstract possibilities; they’re predictable outcomes South Korea would be expected to absorb first, before the U.S., before China, before anyone.
It also functions as diplomatic signaling. Saying “we don’t want to see an immediate collapse” reassures Beijing and Washington that Seoul isn’t pushing for a destabilizing endgame. That matters in the late-1990s/early-2000s context of Kim’s Sunshine Policy, when engagement was sold as an alternative to either war or reckless strangulation. He’s redefining “success” away from regime change and toward managed change: gradual opening, reduced tensions, incremental leverage. In that sense, the quote is less about North Korea’s survival than about South Korea’s sovereignty - an insistence that the peninsula’s future can’t be dictated by outsiders’ appetite for dramatic outcomes.
The intent is pragmatic deterrence. By stating South Korea can’t “handle” North Korean “difficulties,” Kim is speaking as a head of state responsible for budgets, borders, and lives. Collapse would mean famine logistics, refugees, loose weapons, criminal networks, and a sudden demand for unification at maximum speed. The subtext is that humanitarian disaster and security risk are not abstract possibilities; they’re predictable outcomes South Korea would be expected to absorb first, before the U.S., before China, before anyone.
It also functions as diplomatic signaling. Saying “we don’t want to see an immediate collapse” reassures Beijing and Washington that Seoul isn’t pushing for a destabilizing endgame. That matters in the late-1990s/early-2000s context of Kim’s Sunshine Policy, when engagement was sold as an alternative to either war or reckless strangulation. He’s redefining “success” away from regime change and toward managed change: gradual opening, reduced tensions, incremental leverage. In that sense, the quote is less about North Korea’s survival than about South Korea’s sovereignty - an insistence that the peninsula’s future can’t be dictated by outsiders’ appetite for dramatic outcomes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Kim
Add to List
