"So what is so strange about saying I want Barack Obama to fail if his mission is to reconstruct and reform this nation so that capitalism and individual liberty are not its foundation? I want the country to survive. I want the country to succeed"
About this Quote
Limbaugh’s genius here is the moral judo: he takes an ugly sentiment - “I want Barack Obama to fail” - and flips it into a patriotic duty. The line is built to preempt the obvious backlash by supplying its own rebuttal. If Obama’s “mission” is defined as dismantling “capitalism and individual liberty,” then “fail” stops sounding like sabotage and starts sounding like civic rescue. The sentence doesn’t argue policy so much as it argues vocabulary, daring the audience to accept his framing or be cast as naive about the stakes.
The intent is less about Obama the person than about legitimizing scorched-earth opposition as principle rather than spite. By treating “reconstruct and reform” as code for replacing the nation’s “foundation,” Limbaugh collapses a range of center-left reforms into a single existential threat. That move narrows the space for good-faith disagreement: if the foundation is under attack, compromise becomes complicity.
The subtext is tribal and absolving. He gives listeners permission to root against a sitting president while still feeling like the adults in the room. The repeated “I want” is performative sincerity; it’s also ownership, a claim to define what “the country” really is. Context matters: early Obama-era conservative media thrived on portraying incremental changes (health care, regulation, stimulus) as a covert ideological project. Limbaugh isn’t asking whether Obama’s policies will work. He’s insisting what they mean. Once you accept that premise, the conclusion isn’t controversial - it’s mandatory.
The intent is less about Obama the person than about legitimizing scorched-earth opposition as principle rather than spite. By treating “reconstruct and reform” as code for replacing the nation’s “foundation,” Limbaugh collapses a range of center-left reforms into a single existential threat. That move narrows the space for good-faith disagreement: if the foundation is under attack, compromise becomes complicity.
The subtext is tribal and absolving. He gives listeners permission to root against a sitting president while still feeling like the adults in the room. The repeated “I want” is performative sincerity; it’s also ownership, a claim to define what “the country” really is. Context matters: early Obama-era conservative media thrived on portraying incremental changes (health care, regulation, stimulus) as a covert ideological project. Limbaugh isn’t asking whether Obama’s policies will work. He’s insisting what they mean. Once you accept that premise, the conclusion isn’t controversial - it’s mandatory.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Rush
Add to List

