"Soaring prescription drug costs have placed a tremendous strain on family budgets. They have also imposed a heavy burden on employers - both public and private - who are struggling to provide affordable health insurance coverage to their workers"
About this Quote
Collins frames prescription drug prices as a kitchen-table crisis with a boardroom invoice attached, and that dual-target rhetoric is the tell. By pairing “family budgets” with employers “both public and private,” she builds a coalition story: patients, small businesses, state governments, and corporations are all cast as co-victims of the same malfunctioning market. It’s an argument designed to travel across party lines because it treats the problem less as a moral failing of industry than as a broad economic distortion that hurts everyone who pays premiums, wages, or taxes.
The word choices do quiet work. “Soaring” implies inevitability and momentum, as if prices have escaped normal gravity; “tremendous strain” and “heavy burden” borrow the language of infrastructure stress tests rather than ideological conflict. That matters coming from a centrist Republican senator whose brand has often been pragmatic, incremental bargaining: this is an opening bid for policy intervention that sounds like accounting, not crusade.
The subtext is also strategic in what it omits. There’s no villain named - not pharma, not PBMs, not insurers - which keeps negotiating space open while still legitimizing government action. The employers line is especially pointed: once coverage becomes “struggling to provide,” the cost problem stops being personal misfortune and becomes a threat to labor markets and competitiveness. In the post-ACA era, with high-deductible plans and headline-grabbing specialty drug prices, that’s the pressure point Collins is activating: if drug costs destabilize insurance, they destabilize work itself.
The word choices do quiet work. “Soaring” implies inevitability and momentum, as if prices have escaped normal gravity; “tremendous strain” and “heavy burden” borrow the language of infrastructure stress tests rather than ideological conflict. That matters coming from a centrist Republican senator whose brand has often been pragmatic, incremental bargaining: this is an opening bid for policy intervention that sounds like accounting, not crusade.
The subtext is also strategic in what it omits. There’s no villain named - not pharma, not PBMs, not insurers - which keeps negotiating space open while still legitimizing government action. The employers line is especially pointed: once coverage becomes “struggling to provide,” the cost problem stops being personal misfortune and becomes a threat to labor markets and competitiveness. In the post-ACA era, with high-deductible plans and headline-grabbing specialty drug prices, that’s the pressure point Collins is activating: if drug costs destabilize insurance, they destabilize work itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Susan
Add to List
