"Social psychology has, as a rule, dealt with various phases of social experience from the psychological standpoint of individual experience"
About this Quote
A polite academic sentence, but it carries a quiet accusation: social psychology has been studying society with the wrong instrument. Mead’s phrasing - “as a rule” and “various phases” - is deliberately measured, the sort of restraint that signals a bigger disagreement beneath the surface. He’s not denying the value of individual psychology; he’s saying the field’s default settings have smuggled in a worldview where “the social” is treated as an add-on to a self that is already fully formed.
The subtext is an institutional critique. If you start from individual experience as the baseline, you end up explaining crowds, norms, language, and institutions as secondary effects: pressures acting on a solitary mind. Mead’s work flips that direction of travel. For him, the self is not a sealed container that later encounters society; it is assembled through interaction, through symbols, through learning to see yourself from the standpoint of others. That’s why the line feels like a preface to a methodological reboot: stop treating “social experience” as merely what happens inside a person, and start treating it as something that exists between people, with its own logic.
Context matters: Mead is writing in an early-20th-century moment when psychology is professionalizing, experimenting, quantifying, hunting for the individual unit it can measure. Against that tide, this sentence is a wager that meaning, identity, and even “mind” are not private property. They are public achievements, built in conversation, conflict, and shared life.
The subtext is an institutional critique. If you start from individual experience as the baseline, you end up explaining crowds, norms, language, and institutions as secondary effects: pressures acting on a solitary mind. Mead’s work flips that direction of travel. For him, the self is not a sealed container that later encounters society; it is assembled through interaction, through symbols, through learning to see yourself from the standpoint of others. That’s why the line feels like a preface to a methodological reboot: stop treating “social experience” as merely what happens inside a person, and start treating it as something that exists between people, with its own logic.
Context matters: Mead is writing in an early-20th-century moment when psychology is professionalizing, experimenting, quantifying, hunting for the individual unit it can measure. Against that tide, this sentence is a wager that meaning, identity, and even “mind” are not private property. They are public achievements, built in conversation, conflict, and shared life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List
