"Society historically has a difficult time with the concept of something new and foreign that shakes up our comfortable views, especially if it involves the very volatile question of sexual identity"
About this Quote
People cling to familiar narratives because they stabilize identity, family roles, and moral order. When something disrupts those stories, defensiveness flares. The disruption feels not only new but foreign, as if belonging to an outside force that threatens home ground. Few topics activate that reflex more quickly than sexual identity, because it touches intimacy, reproduction, religion, and law all at once. It asks people to reconsider who counts as a family, how desire is named, and what bodies and selves are authorized in public space.
History shows the cycle. Same-sex love existed long before modern labels, yet was coded as deviant or invisible; when visibility grew, backlash followed. Psychiatry once pathologized homosexuality, then removed it from the diagnostic manual only after activism and evidence forced a reckoning. Gay rights advanced from Stonewall to marriage equality through a sequence of ridicule, panic, and normalization familiar to any social change. Today, debates over trans rights repeat the pattern: sudden visibility prompts moral panics that conflate safety with conformity, while lived experience and storytelling chip away at fear.
The arts sit in the middle of this struggle. Theater and film have long been laboratories for tests of identity, from coded characters under censorship regimes to overtly queer narratives that unsettle and humanize. An actor like Mercedes Ruehl has watched audiences negotiate discomfort in real time, as a script makes foreignness legible and a performer invites empathy. Often, what is called new is simply newly seen. The volatility lies not in the people being represented but in the audience’s sense of self being rearranged.
The line suggests two tasks: to recognize the habitual othering that labels difference as foreign, and to cultivate the capacity to stay with discomfort long enough for it to become comprehension. Social peace does not come from keeping views comfortable, but from expanding comfort to include truths that were always there.
History shows the cycle. Same-sex love existed long before modern labels, yet was coded as deviant or invisible; when visibility grew, backlash followed. Psychiatry once pathologized homosexuality, then removed it from the diagnostic manual only after activism and evidence forced a reckoning. Gay rights advanced from Stonewall to marriage equality through a sequence of ridicule, panic, and normalization familiar to any social change. Today, debates over trans rights repeat the pattern: sudden visibility prompts moral panics that conflate safety with conformity, while lived experience and storytelling chip away at fear.
The arts sit in the middle of this struggle. Theater and film have long been laboratories for tests of identity, from coded characters under censorship regimes to overtly queer narratives that unsettle and humanize. An actor like Mercedes Ruehl has watched audiences negotiate discomfort in real time, as a script makes foreignness legible and a performer invites empathy. Often, what is called new is simply newly seen. The volatility lies not in the people being represented but in the audience’s sense of self being rearranged.
The line suggests two tasks: to recognize the habitual othering that labels difference as foreign, and to cultivate the capacity to stay with discomfort long enough for it to become comprehension. Social peace does not come from keeping views comfortable, but from expanding comfort to include truths that were always there.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Mercedes
Add to List
