"Some artists shrink from self-awareness, fearing that it will destroy their unique gifts and even their desire to create. The truth of the matter is quite opposite"
About this Quote
There is a quiet provocation in Broughton’s setup: he names the fear artists rarely admit out loud, that looking too closely at themselves will pop the balloon. “Self-awareness” gets cast as a kind of bleach, something that sterilizes instinct, flattens mystery, turns the muse into a spreadsheet. By putting that anxiety on the table, he’s already doing what he argues for: refusing the romance of the unconscious genius.
The pivot - “The truth of the matter is quite opposite” - is doing heavy lifting. It’s not just reassurance; it’s a rebuttal to a cultural myth that’s especially sticky in the arts: that authenticity requires naivete, that craft is a betrayal of “pure” feeling. Coming from a director, the claim has extra bite. Film is an art of brutal self-scrutiny: editing forces you to watch yourself back, to confront what plays as honest versus what plays as performative. You can’t hide behind the first take forever. Broughton is hinting that consciousness doesn’t kill desire; it clarifies it, aiming creative energy instead of letting it leak into vague aspiration.
The subtext is also ethical. Self-awareness isn’t only an internal tuning fork; it’s an accountability tool. It asks: what am I doing to an audience, what am I borrowing, what am I repeating without noticing? In the postwar, post-Freud, increasingly confessional arts culture Broughton lived in, that’s not an abstract concern. His line reads like a defense of mature artistry: the “unique gifts” survive scrutiny because they’re not fragile miracles. They’re muscles.
The pivot - “The truth of the matter is quite opposite” - is doing heavy lifting. It’s not just reassurance; it’s a rebuttal to a cultural myth that’s especially sticky in the arts: that authenticity requires naivete, that craft is a betrayal of “pure” feeling. Coming from a director, the claim has extra bite. Film is an art of brutal self-scrutiny: editing forces you to watch yourself back, to confront what plays as honest versus what plays as performative. You can’t hide behind the first take forever. Broughton is hinting that consciousness doesn’t kill desire; it clarifies it, aiming creative energy instead of letting it leak into vague aspiration.
The subtext is also ethical. Self-awareness isn’t only an internal tuning fork; it’s an accountability tool. It asks: what am I doing to an audience, what am I borrowing, what am I repeating without noticing? In the postwar, post-Freud, increasingly confessional arts culture Broughton lived in, that’s not an abstract concern. His line reads like a defense of mature artistry: the “unique gifts” survive scrutiny because they’re not fragile miracles. They’re muscles.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
