"Some folks rail against other folks, because other folks have what some folks would be glad of"
About this Quote
Envy is doing ventriloquism here: Fielding sketches the petty human trick of dressing resentment up as principle. The line’s folksy repetition - "some folks... other folks..". - isn’t just stylistic; it’s a moral microscope. By refusing names, classes, even specific grievances, he turns the speaker into a type, the eternally aggrieved observer who can’t admit what’s really happening inside them. The rhythm mimics gossip, the kind of complaint that travels easily because it asks listeners to join a cozy little court of judgment.
The barb lands in the pivot: "because other folks have what some folks would be glad of". Fielding exposes a contradiction that’s still familiar in modern outrage culture: condemning in public what you privately want. The railing isn’t about justice; it’s about discomfort with someone else’s access to luck, pleasure, status, money, love. He implies that moral language often functions as camouflage for wanting-without-having.
Context matters. Fielding wrote in an 18th-century England newly obsessed with social mobility, consumer appetite, and the performance of virtue - the era when the novel itself became a machine for observing hypocrisy in domestic life. As a magistrate as well as a novelist, Fielding had a street-level view of how grievance and self-justification can become a lifestyle. The quote’s intent isn’t to excuse inequality or critique; it’s to puncture the self-flattering story we tell when we’re jealous. He gives envy no grand psychology, just its most damning feature: it knows exactly what it wants, and pretends it doesn’t.
The barb lands in the pivot: "because other folks have what some folks would be glad of". Fielding exposes a contradiction that’s still familiar in modern outrage culture: condemning in public what you privately want. The railing isn’t about justice; it’s about discomfort with someone else’s access to luck, pleasure, status, money, love. He implies that moral language often functions as camouflage for wanting-without-having.
Context matters. Fielding wrote in an 18th-century England newly obsessed with social mobility, consumer appetite, and the performance of virtue - the era when the novel itself became a machine for observing hypocrisy in domestic life. As a magistrate as well as a novelist, Fielding had a street-level view of how grievance and self-justification can become a lifestyle. The quote’s intent isn’t to excuse inequality or critique; it’s to puncture the self-flattering story we tell when we’re jealous. He gives envy no grand psychology, just its most damning feature: it knows exactly what it wants, and pretends it doesn’t.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List




