"Some things are too important to be left to the private sector"
About this Quote
"Some things are too important to be left to the private sector" is a politician’s most compact weapon: it turns an argument about efficiency into an argument about legitimacy. George Galloway isn’t merely criticizing companies; he’s questioning the moral authority of markets to decide what a society owes its people. The line works because it smuggles in a premise most listeners already half-believe: that there are domains where profit is an improper referee.
The phrasing is doing careful work. "Some things" is deliberately elastic, inviting the audience to fill in the blanks with whatever they fear losing: hospitals, housing, rail, water, war. "Too important" shifts the debate from spreadsheets to stakes; it implies that failure isn’t just inconvenience but harm, inequality, even death. And "left to" suggests neglect rather than choice, casting privatization as abdication by the state, not a neutral policy option.
Galloway’s broader political brand - anti-war, anti-establishment, performatively populist with a flair for moral indictment - gives the line its edge. It’s calibrated for a UK context in which decades of privatization and outsourcing have produced recurring scandals: service hollowing, cost overruns, crumbling infrastructure, and the sense that accountability dissolves when everything is run through contracts. The subtext is accusation: when essentials are commodified, the public becomes a customer and citizenship shrinks into a billing relationship.
It’s also strategic ambiguity. "Private sector" is a convenient villain because it’s both real (shareholders, procurement, monopolies) and symbolic (elite capture, managerial opacity). The quote is less a policy blueprint than a rallying flag: it draws a bright moral boundary and dares opponents to argue that the basics should be optional.
The phrasing is doing careful work. "Some things" is deliberately elastic, inviting the audience to fill in the blanks with whatever they fear losing: hospitals, housing, rail, water, war. "Too important" shifts the debate from spreadsheets to stakes; it implies that failure isn’t just inconvenience but harm, inequality, even death. And "left to" suggests neglect rather than choice, casting privatization as abdication by the state, not a neutral policy option.
Galloway’s broader political brand - anti-war, anti-establishment, performatively populist with a flair for moral indictment - gives the line its edge. It’s calibrated for a UK context in which decades of privatization and outsourcing have produced recurring scandals: service hollowing, cost overruns, crumbling infrastructure, and the sense that accountability dissolves when everything is run through contracts. The subtext is accusation: when essentials are commodified, the public becomes a customer and citizenship shrinks into a billing relationship.
It’s also strategic ambiguity. "Private sector" is a convenient villain because it’s both real (shareholders, procurement, monopolies) and symbolic (elite capture, managerial opacity). The quote is less a policy blueprint than a rallying flag: it draws a bright moral boundary and dares opponents to argue that the basics should be optional.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List


