"Some were brilliant bordering on genius. Others, genius bordering on madness"
About this Quote
Segal’s line turns a familiar romantic myth into a calibrated double-take: brilliance isn’t a safe pedestal, it’s a border crossing. The sentence hinges on a near-mathematical inversion - “brilliant bordering on genius” flips to “genius bordering on madness” - and that symmetry is doing the real work. It suggests a continuum where the difference between admirable and alarming is less about kind than about degree, and less about degree than about who’s doing the labeling.
As a novelist, Segal isn’t diagnosing anyone; he’s staging a social sorting mechanism. “Some were” and “Others” reads like a roll call, the voice of an observer (or institution) quietly assigning people into categories that flatter the first group and pathologize the second. The subtext: we celebrate exceptional minds when they’re legible, productive, charming - and we call the same intensity “madness” when it becomes inconvenient, disruptive, or simply too hard to translate into polite behavior.
What makes the line sting is its implication that the border is movable. Genius can be praised as brilliance when it serves the room, and condemned as instability when it refuses. Segal’s choice to place “madness” right up against “genius” doesn’t just flirt with the trope; it questions the audience’s appetite for it. We want gifted people to entertain us, solve problems, and stay aesthetically troubled rather than genuinely difficult. The quote exposes that bargain, and the quiet cruelty baked into it.
As a novelist, Segal isn’t diagnosing anyone; he’s staging a social sorting mechanism. “Some were” and “Others” reads like a roll call, the voice of an observer (or institution) quietly assigning people into categories that flatter the first group and pathologize the second. The subtext: we celebrate exceptional minds when they’re legible, productive, charming - and we call the same intensity “madness” when it becomes inconvenient, disruptive, or simply too hard to translate into polite behavior.
What makes the line sting is its implication that the border is movable. Genius can be praised as brilliance when it serves the room, and condemned as instability when it refuses. Segal’s choice to place “madness” right up against “genius” doesn’t just flirt with the trope; it questions the audience’s appetite for it. We want gifted people to entertain us, solve problems, and stay aesthetically troubled rather than genuinely difficult. The quote exposes that bargain, and the quiet cruelty baked into it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Erich
Add to List



