"Somehow I wasn't completely crucified by the critics. I don't know how or why, I probably should've been"

In this honest declaration by Leif Garrett, the speaker reviews his experiences with critics, expressing a sense of surprise and humbleness. Garrett acknowledges that, regardless of his expectations, he was not entirely "crucified" by critics. This option of the word "crucified" is potent, recommending a harsh, merciless critique that might have been targeted at him however in some way wasn't. This dramatic word choice indicates that Garrett saw potential for serious criticism in his work or public persona, underscoring an expectation of negative feedback that goes beyond simple critique to a more profound level of personal and professional attack.

The subsequent admission--"I do not know how or why, I probably need to've been"-- reveals a layer of self-awareness and vulnerability. Garrett appears to acknowledge prospective defects or errors that might have necessitated harsher criticism. This might suggest that he sees himself as having deviated from certain norms or having actually chosen that did not line up with mainstream expectations.

Furthermore, this declaration encapsulates a sense of appreciation and relief, recommending that Garrett emerged relatively untouched from a potentially difficult duration. It talks to an acknowledgment of fortune or grace, which he finds puzzling yet unquestionably advantageous. This element of the quote also touches on the unpredictable nature of public and crucial reception, which can be as much about timing, personality, and context as it is about the quality of the work itself.

In general, Garrett's quote is a reflection on durability and the complex relationship between artists and critics. It integrates components of self-questioning, appreciation, and humility, acknowledging both his perceived imperfections and the unanticipated leniency he got, leaving him with a sense of marvel about the helpful elements of that experience.