"Something is wanting, and something must be done, or we shall be involved in all the horror of failure, and civil war without a prospect of its termination"
About this Quote
Henry Knox speaks from the uneasy vacuum of the mid-1780s, when the American Revolution had been won but the republic’s machinery was faltering. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the power to tax, regulate commerce, or enforce its resolutions. War debts lingered, interstate rivalries sharpened, and the government could not reliably pay soldiers or protect property. The phrase "something is wanting" names that absence of national energy and authority; "something must be done" is the blunt insistence that tinkering at the edges would not suffice.
A seasoned general and future Secretary of War, Knox had seen disunion and improvisation on the battlefield. His warning arose during the unrest that culminated in Shays’ Rebellion, when farmers in Massachusetts, burdened by debt and taxes, confronted courts and militia. To Knox, these eruptions were not isolated grievances but symptoms of structural weakness. If the center could not mediate between creditors and debtors, coastal merchants and inland farmers, states and neighbors, conflicts would metastasize. Hence the stark image: the horror of failure and civil war without a prospect of its termination. Without a legitimate umpire, violence would feed on itself, each faction claiming justice, none conceding defeat.
The line also reveals a federalist conviction: republican liberty depends not on the mere absence of power, but on well-constructed power constrained by law. Knox’s urgency supported the call for a stronger union that culminated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He and his peers sought an energetic national government capable of raising revenue, regulating trade, and enforcing laws, while balancing popular representation with safeguards against sudden passions.
As rhetoric, the sentence tightens necessity and fear into a single imperative. It is a soldier’s candid measure of risk and a statesman’s argument for redesign. The choice he sketches is stark: either supply what is lacking or watch the experiment unwind into anarchy and the kind of war that, for want of authority, cannot end.
A seasoned general and future Secretary of War, Knox had seen disunion and improvisation on the battlefield. His warning arose during the unrest that culminated in Shays’ Rebellion, when farmers in Massachusetts, burdened by debt and taxes, confronted courts and militia. To Knox, these eruptions were not isolated grievances but symptoms of structural weakness. If the center could not mediate between creditors and debtors, coastal merchants and inland farmers, states and neighbors, conflicts would metastasize. Hence the stark image: the horror of failure and civil war without a prospect of its termination. Without a legitimate umpire, violence would feed on itself, each faction claiming justice, none conceding defeat.
The line also reveals a federalist conviction: republican liberty depends not on the mere absence of power, but on well-constructed power constrained by law. Knox’s urgency supported the call for a stronger union that culminated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He and his peers sought an energetic national government capable of raising revenue, regulating trade, and enforcing laws, while balancing popular representation with safeguards against sudden passions.
As rhetoric, the sentence tightens necessity and fear into a single imperative. It is a soldier’s candid measure of risk and a statesman’s argument for redesign. The choice he sketches is stark: either supply what is lacking or watch the experiment unwind into anarchy and the kind of war that, for want of authority, cannot end.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List
