"Sometimes we tend to focus more on the personalities and the conflicts, and it really caricatures the issues"
About this Quote
There is a diplomat's quiet rebuke baked into Reiss's phrasing: our political attention span has been trained to binge characters, not comprehend causes. "Personalities and the conflicts" isn't just a descriptive pair; it's a diagnosis of how public debate gets packaged. The closer we get to faces and feuds, the easier it is to mistake theater for substance. Reiss is pointing to a media-and-politics feedback loop where narrative needs villains, heroes, betrayals, and rivalries because those travel faster than structural realities.
"Caricatures" is the tell. A caricature isn't simply inaccurate; it's selectively exaggerated, stripping complexity down to a few loud, marketable features. That's what happens when negotiations, wars, or policy disputes are reduced to the temperaments of leaders or the drama between factions. The subtext is cautionary: if you frame outcomes as the product of clashing egos, you erase incentives, institutions, history, and the brutal constraints that make certain choices rational, even when they're ugly.
As a diplomat, Reiss is also defending a particular ethic of seriousness. Diplomacy depends on keeping multiple truths in view at once: domestic politics, security dilemmas, cultural memory, resource scarcity. When the public conversation fixates on "who's winning" a conflict of wills, it pressures officials to perform toughness rather than solve problems, and it encourages audiences to root for a side rather than ask what settlement is actually possible.
The intent, then, is corrective and strategic: shift the lens from psychodrama to policy, from spectacle to stakes.
"Caricatures" is the tell. A caricature isn't simply inaccurate; it's selectively exaggerated, stripping complexity down to a few loud, marketable features. That's what happens when negotiations, wars, or policy disputes are reduced to the temperaments of leaders or the drama between factions. The subtext is cautionary: if you frame outcomes as the product of clashing egos, you erase incentives, institutions, history, and the brutal constraints that make certain choices rational, even when they're ugly.
As a diplomat, Reiss is also defending a particular ethic of seriousness. Diplomacy depends on keeping multiple truths in view at once: domestic politics, security dilemmas, cultural memory, resource scarcity. When the public conversation fixates on "who's winning" a conflict of wills, it pressures officials to perform toughness rather than solve problems, and it encourages audiences to root for a side rather than ask what settlement is actually possible.
The intent, then, is corrective and strategic: shift the lens from psychodrama to policy, from spectacle to stakes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Mitchell
Add to List


