"Sometimes when you stand face to face with someone, you cannot see his face"
About this Quote
The line lands like a paradox, but it reads truer the longer you’ve watched power operate up close. Gorbachev is describing a basic political problem: proximity can distort perception. Stand “face to face” with a rival, an ally, a bureaucracy, even a whole country, and the human details you think you’re reading get washed out by heat and glare - protocol, projection, fear, ego. You’re so near the confrontation that you’re no longer actually seeing the person; you’re seeing your own expectations, or the role they’re forced to play.
Coming from a late-Soviet statesman, the subtext is pointed. Gorbachev spent his career in a system built on masks: public unanimity, private doubt; official language that hid real intent. In that world, “face” is not just a literal visage but the curated identity of the Party, the “enemy,” the West, the reformer. When you’re close enough to negotiate, threaten, or plead, the other side’s humanity can vanish behind symbols. That’s how hard lines calcify: not because people are ignorant of the other, but because they feel they know them too well.
The intent, then, is a warning against the false clarity of confrontation. It’s also an argument for distance of a certain kind: not detachment, but perspective. Gorbachev’s reforms depended on seeing beyond rehearsed expressions - the Soviet self-image, the Western caricature, the internal opponents framed as traitors. The paradox works because it flips the romantic myth that closeness guarantees understanding. Sometimes it guarantees the opposite.
Coming from a late-Soviet statesman, the subtext is pointed. Gorbachev spent his career in a system built on masks: public unanimity, private doubt; official language that hid real intent. In that world, “face” is not just a literal visage but the curated identity of the Party, the “enemy,” the West, the reformer. When you’re close enough to negotiate, threaten, or plead, the other side’s humanity can vanish behind symbols. That’s how hard lines calcify: not because people are ignorant of the other, but because they feel they know them too well.
The intent, then, is a warning against the false clarity of confrontation. It’s also an argument for distance of a certain kind: not detachment, but perspective. Gorbachev’s reforms depended on seeing beyond rehearsed expressions - the Soviet self-image, the Western caricature, the internal opponents framed as traitors. The paradox works because it flips the romantic myth that closeness guarantees understanding. Sometimes it guarantees the opposite.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Mikhail
Add to List
