"Subordination tends greatly to human happiness. Were we all upon an equality, we should have no other enjoyment than mere animal pleasure"
About this Quote
Johnson is doing what he does best: dressing a provocation in the calm, marmoreal tone of “obvious truth,” then letting it sting. “Subordination” is a loaded, almost bureaucratic word for something visceral: hierarchy, deference, knowing your place. He doesn’t merely defend it as practical; he sells it as psychologically necessary. Without rank, he claims, we’d be reduced to “mere animal pleasure” - a phrase that both flatters the refined reader (you are not an animal) and warns of social flattening as moral degradation.
The intent is conservative, but not simple-minded. Johnson is arguing that happiness isn’t just comfort or freedom; it’s structure. Subtext: people crave recognition, and recognition requires gradations - someone to look up to, someone to be responsible for, someone whose judgment counts. Equality, in this frame, isn’t justice; it’s an aesthetic and emotional impoverishment, a world where status can’t be earned, displayed, or honored, leaving only the body’s appetites as “enjoyment.”
Context matters. Johnson writes in an 18th-century Britain where class, patronage, and inherited station were the operating system, and where early democratic ideals were beginning to look less like philosophy and more like a threat. His anxiety isn’t only about politics; it’s about meaning. Take away the social ladder and you don’t just redistribute power - you scramble the narratives that tell people who they are. The irony is that Johnson, a self-made man who disliked aristocratic frivolity, still defends hierarchy because he sees it as the scaffold for dignity, restraint, and ambition - the very things that keep “happiness” from collapsing into consumption.
The intent is conservative, but not simple-minded. Johnson is arguing that happiness isn’t just comfort or freedom; it’s structure. Subtext: people crave recognition, and recognition requires gradations - someone to look up to, someone to be responsible for, someone whose judgment counts. Equality, in this frame, isn’t justice; it’s an aesthetic and emotional impoverishment, a world where status can’t be earned, displayed, or honored, leaving only the body’s appetites as “enjoyment.”
Context matters. Johnson writes in an 18th-century Britain where class, patronage, and inherited station were the operating system, and where early democratic ideals were beginning to look less like philosophy and more like a threat. His anxiety isn’t only about politics; it’s about meaning. Take away the social ladder and you don’t just redistribute power - you scramble the narratives that tell people who they are. The irony is that Johnson, a self-made man who disliked aristocratic frivolity, still defends hierarchy because he sees it as the scaffold for dignity, restraint, and ambition - the very things that keep “happiness” from collapsing into consumption.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Samuel
Add to List








