"Such discoveries have led me, and other geologists, to reconsider the evidence previously derived from caves brought forward in proof of the high antiquity of Man"
About this Quote
There is a quiet dynamite in Lyell's phrasing: not the swagger of a man toppling an old worldview, but the practiced caution of someone inviting you to watch him move a fulcrum. "Such discoveries" arrives as a polite placeholder for disruptive new facts, letting the evidence do the destabilizing while the speaker preserves the decorum of science. The sentence is built like a legal brief - unsurprising for a lawyer by training - with its chain of qualifications: "led me, and other geologists", "to reconsider", "previously derived", "brought forward in proof". Each clause narrows the claim, signaling a mind keenly aware that debates over human antiquity weren't just technical; they were cultural flashpoints.
The context is mid-19th century geology's collision with theology and with itself. Caves had been a courtroom of their own: stalagmites, bone beds, and stone tools entered as exhibits for (or against) "the high antiquity of Man". Lyell's subtext is methodological humility that doubles as a power move. He doesn't declare the cave evidence false; he reclassifies it as evidence that must survive cross-examination under new standards. "Reconsider" suggests not surrender but recalibration, the scientific equivalent of reopening a case because the rules of admissibility changed.
There's also an institutional "we" being assembled. By pulling "other geologists" into the sentence, Lyell frames revision not as personal inconsistency but as collective due process. It's a bid for legitimacy: when the conclusion is explosive, the tone must be restrained enough to make the explosion feel inevitable.
The context is mid-19th century geology's collision with theology and with itself. Caves had been a courtroom of their own: stalagmites, bone beds, and stone tools entered as exhibits for (or against) "the high antiquity of Man". Lyell's subtext is methodological humility that doubles as a power move. He doesn't declare the cave evidence false; he reclassifies it as evidence that must survive cross-examination under new standards. "Reconsider" suggests not surrender but recalibration, the scientific equivalent of reopening a case because the rules of admissibility changed.
There's also an institutional "we" being assembled. By pulling "other geologists" into the sentence, Lyell frames revision not as personal inconsistency but as collective due process. It's a bid for legitimacy: when the conclusion is explosive, the tone must be restrained enough to make the explosion feel inevitable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
