"Sun Tzu does not need my praise. His work has lived for over two thousand years, and will surely live for another two thousand without any help from me"
About this Quote
Van Creveld’s line is a studied refusal to perform the ritual everyone expects: the dutiful Western intellectual bowing before an Eastern classic. By declaring Sun Tzu “does not need my praise,” he frames himself as almost comically irrelevant beside a text that has outlasted empires, languages, and entire theories of war. It’s modesty, but the kind that doubles as authority. Only someone confident in his own standing can afford to step back so conspicuously.
The subtext is a quiet jab at the academic economy of endorsement. Scholars often act as gatekeepers, “validating” older works for contemporary readers, as if longevity were not already the strongest credential imaginable. Van Creveld punctures that pretense: The Art of War doesn’t require another footnote, another preface, another blurb to become legitimate. Its survival is the argument.
Context matters. As a military historian writing in a field that cyclically reinvents itself - with each generation promising a new “revolution in military affairs” - van Creveld uses Sun Tzu as a benchmark for what actually lasts. The two-thousand-years-to-two-thousand-more phrasing is deliberately hyperbolic, but it sharpens the point: real strategic insight travels well because it’s portable across technologies and political fashions.
There’s also a wry defensive move here. By refusing praise, he preempts accusations of hero worship or orientalist romanticism. He positions his engagement not as reverence, but as a conversation with a durable tool: a text that doesn’t need rescuing, only rereading.
The subtext is a quiet jab at the academic economy of endorsement. Scholars often act as gatekeepers, “validating” older works for contemporary readers, as if longevity were not already the strongest credential imaginable. Van Creveld punctures that pretense: The Art of War doesn’t require another footnote, another preface, another blurb to become legitimate. Its survival is the argument.
Context matters. As a military historian writing in a field that cyclically reinvents itself - with each generation promising a new “revolution in military affairs” - van Creveld uses Sun Tzu as a benchmark for what actually lasts. The two-thousand-years-to-two-thousand-more phrasing is deliberately hyperbolic, but it sharpens the point: real strategic insight travels well because it’s portable across technologies and political fashions.
There’s also a wry defensive move here. By refusing praise, he preempts accusations of hero worship or orientalist romanticism. He positions his engagement not as reverence, but as a conversation with a durable tool: a text that doesn’t need rescuing, only rereading.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List








