"Sure, you would lose more bombers without fighters, but, flying in formation, you could get the job done"
About this Quote
The cold comfort of this line is how casually it converts human risk into a spreadsheet problem. Symington is conceding the obvious - unescorted bombers get chewed up - and then brushing past it with managerial confidence: accept higher losses, keep the formation tight, finish the mission. It’s the language of a businessman trying to sound like a wartime pragmatist, smoothing a brutal trade-off into something that resembles operational common sense.
The intent feels twofold. On the surface, it’s an argument for feasibility: even without fighter protection, a disciplined system can still deliver results. Underneath, it’s a defense of doctrine and institutional momentum. “Flying in formation” isn’t just a tactic; it’s a belief that organization and technology can substitute for the messy unpredictability of combat. The phrase “get the job done” is tellingly vague, as if destruction at a distance is just another deliverable.
Context matters because debates over strategic bombing in the mid-20th century weren’t only about battlefield outcomes; they were about budgets, prestige, and the promise that airpower could win wars efficiently. Symington, who moved between business and government power circles, speaks in a register that treats loss as a cost center and success as throughput. The subtext is the moral anesthetic of bureaucracy: if the plan is coherent and the output is achieved, the blood price becomes a tolerable variable rather than the central fact.
The intent feels twofold. On the surface, it’s an argument for feasibility: even without fighter protection, a disciplined system can still deliver results. Underneath, it’s a defense of doctrine and institutional momentum. “Flying in formation” isn’t just a tactic; it’s a belief that organization and technology can substitute for the messy unpredictability of combat. The phrase “get the job done” is tellingly vague, as if destruction at a distance is just another deliverable.
Context matters because debates over strategic bombing in the mid-20th century weren’t only about battlefield outcomes; they were about budgets, prestige, and the promise that airpower could win wars efficiently. Symington, who moved between business and government power circles, speaks in a register that treats loss as a cost center and success as throughput. The subtext is the moral anesthetic of bureaucracy: if the plan is coherent and the output is achieved, the blood price becomes a tolerable variable rather than the central fact.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Stuart
Add to List






