"Take away hatred from some people, and you have men without faith"
About this Quote
Hoffer lands the punch by treating hatred not as a moral failure but as a kind of substitute religion. The line is built on a grim inversion: we assume hate is what crowds pick up when they lose faith; he suggests the opposite can be true - that hatred is what props certain people up when faith, meaning, or direction is otherwise absent. Take it away and you don't get healed citizens; you get hollowed-out men staring at the void.
The specific intent is diagnostic, almost clinical. Hoffer, writing in the shadow of mass movements and totalitarian ideologies, was obsessed with why individuals fuse their identity to a cause. Hatred, in his framework, is adhesive. It provides a ready-made map of the world (good/bad), a community (fellow haters), and a purpose (opposition) that feels like conviction. Calling that "faith" is the provocation: he collapses the distance between spiritual certainty and political animus, implying both can be driven by the same hunger to escape doubt and personal responsibility.
The subtext is uncomfortable because it denies the comforting story that hatred is merely a removable toxin. For some, hate is an organizing principle, a way to outsource self-definition to an enemy. It also hints at why de-radicalization is so hard: you can't just subtract hatred; you have to replace the function it served - belonging, dignity, narrative, momentum. Hoffer's cynicism isn't that people are uniquely evil; it's that meaning is so scarce we'll settle for venom if it offers structure.
The specific intent is diagnostic, almost clinical. Hoffer, writing in the shadow of mass movements and totalitarian ideologies, was obsessed with why individuals fuse their identity to a cause. Hatred, in his framework, is adhesive. It provides a ready-made map of the world (good/bad), a community (fellow haters), and a purpose (opposition) that feels like conviction. Calling that "faith" is the provocation: he collapses the distance between spiritual certainty and political animus, implying both can be driven by the same hunger to escape doubt and personal responsibility.
The subtext is uncomfortable because it denies the comforting story that hatred is merely a removable toxin. For some, hate is an organizing principle, a way to outsource self-definition to an enemy. It also hints at why de-radicalization is so hard: you can't just subtract hatred; you have to replace the function it served - belonging, dignity, narrative, momentum. Hoffer's cynicism isn't that people are uniquely evil; it's that meaning is so scarce we'll settle for venom if it offers structure.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Eric
Add to List











