"Tech Jacket shares the same tone as Invincible, but the subject matter is very different. Where Invincible is about perfection, Tech Jacket is about flaws"
About this Quote
Kirkman is doing a neat bit of brand management here, but it doubles as a thesis statement about why superhero stories still have room to surprise us. By promising the same tone as Invincible, he signals the familiar cocktail: violence with a wink, sincerity that refuses to stay dead, big feelings delivered through pulp velocity. That’s the sales pitch. The pivot comes in the contrast he draws between “perfection” and “flaws,” and it’s less about plot than about what kind of pressure the story applies to its hero.
Calling Invincible “about perfection” isn’t a literal claim that Mark Grayson is flawless; it’s about the corrosive demand to be. The series weaponizes idealization: the perfect hero legacy, the perfect moral choice, the perfect family narrative. When that fantasy breaks, it breaks loudly. Kirkman’s subtext is that Invincible is powered by the tension between aspiration and the horrifying cost of maintaining it.
Tech Jacket, by comparison, is positioned as a story that doesn’t start from the pedestal. “Flaws” suggests misfit energy: a protagonist defined by limitations, bad instincts, compromised tools, imperfect alliances. It’s an invitation to read the book less as a test of whether someone can live up to a symbol and more as a study of what happens when the symbol never quite fits. That’s a different engine for drama, and a different kind of catharsis.
Contextually, this is also Kirkman defending range inside a shared universe. Same emotional weather, different climate system: one comic interrogates the fantasy of being worthy; the other makes the messiness the point.
Calling Invincible “about perfection” isn’t a literal claim that Mark Grayson is flawless; it’s about the corrosive demand to be. The series weaponizes idealization: the perfect hero legacy, the perfect moral choice, the perfect family narrative. When that fantasy breaks, it breaks loudly. Kirkman’s subtext is that Invincible is powered by the tension between aspiration and the horrifying cost of maintaining it.
Tech Jacket, by comparison, is positioned as a story that doesn’t start from the pedestal. “Flaws” suggests misfit energy: a protagonist defined by limitations, bad instincts, compromised tools, imperfect alliances. It’s an invitation to read the book less as a test of whether someone can live up to a symbol and more as a study of what happens when the symbol never quite fits. That’s a different engine for drama, and a different kind of catharsis.
Contextually, this is also Kirkman defending range inside a shared universe. Same emotional weather, different climate system: one comic interrogates the fantasy of being worthy; the other makes the messiness the point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
