"Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards"
About this Quote
Aldous Huxley’s barb lands because it flips the usual self-congratulation of modernity into an accusation: our machines don’t automatically make us better, they just make us faster at being worse. The word “merely” is doing quiet violence here, draining progress of its romance. It suggests a civilization mistaking velocity for direction, mistaking new tools for new ethics. “More efficient” is the knife twist; it’s the language of factories, managers, and optimization, applied to moral regression as if cruelty, conformity, and stupidity can be streamlined like a supply chain.
The subtext is classic Huxley: the future isn’t necessarily a boot on the face (Orwell), it’s a comfortable slide into acquiescence. Technology doesn’t arrive as a villain; it arrives as convenience, entertainment, and administrative order. That’s why “going backwards” hits harder than “decline.” Backwards implies we already know better. The tragedy is not ignorance but abdication: we trade judgment for systems, attention for stimulation, responsibility for procedure.
Context matters. Writing in the first half of the 20th century, Huxley had watched industrial efficiency feed mechanized slaughter, propaganda, and mass culture. The same technical genius that electrified homes also optimized war and bureaucracy. His intent isn’t anti-invention; it’s anti-naivete. Progress, he implies, is a moral project that tools can amplify but never supply.
The subtext is classic Huxley: the future isn’t necessarily a boot on the face (Orwell), it’s a comfortable slide into acquiescence. Technology doesn’t arrive as a villain; it arrives as convenience, entertainment, and administrative order. That’s why “going backwards” hits harder than “decline.” Backwards implies we already know better. The tragedy is not ignorance but abdication: we trade judgment for systems, attention for stimulation, responsibility for procedure.
Context matters. Writing in the first half of the 20th century, Huxley had watched industrial efficiency feed mechanized slaughter, propaganda, and mass culture. The same technical genius that electrified homes also optimized war and bureaucracy. His intent isn’t anti-invention; it’s anti-naivete. Progress, he implies, is a moral project that tools can amplify but never supply.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: Ends and Means (Aldous Huxley, 1937)
Evidence: Chapter 1 (page 9 in some later/reprint editions). Primary origin appears to be Huxley’s own book *Ends and Means* (1937), where the sentence occurs as part of a longer passage (“Technological advance is rapid… Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going back... Other candidates (2) Aldous Huxley (Aldous Huxley) compilation97.7% nd means 1937 technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards ch 1 p Shame, Fame, and the Technological Mentality (Dustin Peone, 2021) compilation92.3% ... Aldous Huxley observed, “Technological advance is rapid. But without progress in charity, technological ... Techn... |
| Featured | This quote was our Quote of the Day on November 17, 2023 |
More Quotes by Aldous
Add to List




