"Temple was a man of the world amongst men of letters, a man of letters amongst men of the world"
About this Quote
The subtext is that most people fail this test. Men of letters are imagined as brilliant but impractical, sealed inside their own cleverness; men of the world as effective but shallow, fluent in influence and indifferent to ideas. Temple becomes the exception who exposes the rule. That’s why the sentence lands with such crisp symmetry: it suggests equilibrium, self-command, and a kind of moral tact - not merely knowing both dialects, but knowing when to speak each.
Context matters because Macaulay, a historian and statesman, was himself invested in defending the legitimacy of the public intellectual before that category had a name. The compliment is also a quiet rebuke to professionalized specialization: Temple’s worth lies in translation. He can carry seriousness into society without becoming pedantic, and bring reality into literature without becoming cynical. Macaulay makes that doubleness sound like destiny, but it’s really a cultivated performance - the highest Victorian one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Macaulay, Thomas B. (2026, January 15). Temple was a man of the world amongst men of letters, a man of letters amongst men of the world. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/temple-was-a-man-of-the-world-amongst-men-of-154204/
Chicago Style
Macaulay, Thomas B. "Temple was a man of the world amongst men of letters, a man of letters amongst men of the world." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/temple-was-a-man-of-the-world-amongst-men-of-154204/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Temple was a man of the world amongst men of letters, a man of letters amongst men of the world." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/temple-was-a-man-of-the-world-amongst-men-of-154204/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2026.









