"Thank goodness we don't live in medieval times, when people fought wars over ideas"
About this Quote
Jaruzelski’s line lands like a weary sigh from a man who wants history to do his PR. “Thank goodness” signals relief, even innocence: look how civilized we are now. Then comes the pivot: medieval people fought wars over ideas, as if modern conflict has matured into something more rational, less fanatical. It’s a tidy, self-exculpating contrast, and it’s doing political work.
Because Jaruzelski wasn’t an armchair commentator. He was the Polish general who imposed martial law in 1981 to crush Solidarity, presiding over a state that treated ideas - independent unions, free speech, political pluralism - as existential threats. In that context, the quote reads less like a critique of ideological violence than a wink at the audience: today’s rulers don’t persecute ideas, they manage “order.” The medieval straw man lets him recast coercion as modern governance.
The subtext is sharper: if war over ideas is primitive, then dissent itself becomes a kind of atavism, a refusal to accept the supposedly post-ideological present. That framing is common to late Cold War authoritarian rhetoric, which liked to pose as technocratic and peace-keeping while deploying force to keep the ideological balance intact.
It also sneaks in a historical sleight of hand. The 20th century was defined by industrialized mass killing driven by ideas - fascism, communism, nationalism. Jaruzelski’s irony, intentional or not, is that “medieval” here isn’t a time period. It’s a label he pins on political conviction, especially when it challenges him.
Because Jaruzelski wasn’t an armchair commentator. He was the Polish general who imposed martial law in 1981 to crush Solidarity, presiding over a state that treated ideas - independent unions, free speech, political pluralism - as existential threats. In that context, the quote reads less like a critique of ideological violence than a wink at the audience: today’s rulers don’t persecute ideas, they manage “order.” The medieval straw man lets him recast coercion as modern governance.
The subtext is sharper: if war over ideas is primitive, then dissent itself becomes a kind of atavism, a refusal to accept the supposedly post-ideological present. That framing is common to late Cold War authoritarian rhetoric, which liked to pose as technocratic and peace-keeping while deploying force to keep the ideological balance intact.
It also sneaks in a historical sleight of hand. The 20th century was defined by industrialized mass killing driven by ideas - fascism, communism, nationalism. Jaruzelski’s irony, intentional or not, is that “medieval” here isn’t a time period. It’s a label he pins on political conviction, especially when it challenges him.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Wojciech
Add to List






