"That a literature in our time is living is shown in that way that it debates problems"
About this Quote
A literature that stops arguing is already halfway to becoming a museum. Brandes, the great Scandinavian critic and evangelist of modernity, is laying down a test that feels almost journalistic: if writing matters now, it has to pick fights now. The line is less a compliment to “serious themes” than a demand for friction. “Living” doesn’t mean popular or beautiful; it means entangled with the unsettled questions a society would rather outsource to politicians, priests, or polite silence.
The phrasing is telling. Literature “is shown” to be alive not by style or sentiment, but by behavior: it “debates.” Brandes smuggles in a civic model of art. Novels, plays, poems become public forums, not private reveries. That’s a rebuke to late-Romantic aestheticism and to any national literature content to rehearse myths while real pressures-industrialization, secularization, gender politics, class conflict-go unspoken. For Brandes, the author isn’t a nightingale; they’re an editor with a conscience.
The subtext is also combative about power. “Problems” aren’t abstract puzzles; they’re social contradictions with winners and losers. To debate them is to risk offense, censorship, and backlash, which is precisely Brandes’s point: controversy is a sign of circulation, not decay. He’s arguing for literature as a diagnostic tool, a place where a culture admits what it cannot yet resolve.
Read in context of Brandes’s “Modern Breakthrough,” it’s a manifesto in miniature: stop embalming art, start using it as an instrument of modern life.
The phrasing is telling. Literature “is shown” to be alive not by style or sentiment, but by behavior: it “debates.” Brandes smuggles in a civic model of art. Novels, plays, poems become public forums, not private reveries. That’s a rebuke to late-Romantic aestheticism and to any national literature content to rehearse myths while real pressures-industrialization, secularization, gender politics, class conflict-go unspoken. For Brandes, the author isn’t a nightingale; they’re an editor with a conscience.
The subtext is also combative about power. “Problems” aren’t abstract puzzles; they’re social contradictions with winners and losers. To debate them is to risk offense, censorship, and backlash, which is precisely Brandes’s point: controversy is a sign of circulation, not decay. He’s arguing for literature as a diagnostic tool, a place where a culture admits what it cannot yet resolve.
Read in context of Brandes’s “Modern Breakthrough,” it’s a manifesto in miniature: stop embalming art, start using it as an instrument of modern life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Georg
Add to List





