"That attitude toward women as objects may have worked for the late Sixties, but it doesn't do so now"
About this Quote
The subtext is industry-facing. A director isn’t just talking about personal ethics here; he’s talking about what stories get financed, what kinds of scenes get normalized, what an actress is asked to endure for a “realistic” performance. By framing objectification as an “attitude,” he pins it to a worldview rather than a few bad apples. It’s a critique of default settings: how camera language, casting, and character writing conspire to flatten women into props for male self-discovery.
There’s also a self-aware defensiveness: Schlesinger, whose career bridged the permissive 60s and the more self-scrutinizing decades that followed, is signaling adaptation. The line doesn’t claim moral enlightenment so much as cultural accountability. What once played as edgy now reads as dated, and in film, “dated” is often the first step toward “indefensible.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Schlesinger, John. (2026, January 17). That attitude toward women as objects may have worked for the late Sixties, but it doesn't do so now. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/that-attitude-toward-women-as-objects-may-have-80341/
Chicago Style
Schlesinger, John. "That attitude toward women as objects may have worked for the late Sixties, but it doesn't do so now." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/that-attitude-toward-women-as-objects-may-have-80341/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"That attitude toward women as objects may have worked for the late Sixties, but it doesn't do so now." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/that-attitude-toward-women-as-objects-may-have-80341/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



