"That has to remain the principal reason for doing it, doesn't it? I know it's possible to write for money, and many very good writers have done so. But for me, it has to remain the principal thing that I actually want to do the writing"
About this Quote
The most revealing move here is the self-interruption: a question that answers itself, then keeps talking anyway. Kellerman frames writing as something that needs a moral alibi. Money is acknowledged as a legitimate motive - he even grants it prestige, nodding to "very good writers" - but he quickly quarantines that possibility from his own practice. It's a careful bit of professional boundary-setting: he's not condemning commerce, he's protecting desire.
Coming from a psychologist-turned-novelist, the subtext is almost clinical. Motivation matters because motivation leaks into the work. If the principal reason is cash, the writing starts optimizing for external reward: trends, deadlines, audience expectation. If the principal reason is wanting to write, the work gets to be internally coherent, driven by curiosity, compulsion, and the private satisfactions that keep a person returning to the page when no one is watching. The repetition of "principal" reads like a diagnostic criterion - the primary cause that organizes all the others.
There's also a quiet anxiety in "has to remain". As if the market, success, or sheer productivity could erode the original impulse. Kellerman is speaking from inside a culture that treats authorship as content production and creativity as a monetizable brand. The line isn't romantic; it's defensive. He isn't claiming purity. He's describing a maintenance task: preserving the core appetite so the profession doesn't hollow out the practice.
Coming from a psychologist-turned-novelist, the subtext is almost clinical. Motivation matters because motivation leaks into the work. If the principal reason is cash, the writing starts optimizing for external reward: trends, deadlines, audience expectation. If the principal reason is wanting to write, the work gets to be internally coherent, driven by curiosity, compulsion, and the private satisfactions that keep a person returning to the page when no one is watching. The repetition of "principal" reads like a diagnostic criterion - the primary cause that organizes all the others.
There's also a quiet anxiety in "has to remain". As if the market, success, or sheer productivity could erode the original impulse. Kellerman is speaking from inside a culture that treats authorship as content production and creativity as a monetizable brand. The line isn't romantic; it's defensive. He isn't claiming purity. He's describing a maintenance task: preserving the core appetite so the profession doesn't hollow out the practice.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List





