"That is what great athletes can do: they give us a model of striving for human perfection"
About this Quote
Great athletes, in Armstrong Williams's framing, aren’t just entertainers; they’re portable moral machinery. The line turns sports into a kind of public ethics class, where the body becomes proof-of-concept for virtues we claim to admire: discipline, resilience, sacrifice, focus under pressure. Calling them a "model" is doing a lot of work: it asks us to treat performance not as spectacle but as instruction, to watch a jumper or striker the way earlier eras watched saints.
The key phrase is "striving for human perfection". Williams doesn’t promise perfection (which would sound delusional); he praises striving, the pursuit itself. That’s a smart rhetorical hedge in a culture that loves winners but distrusts sanctimony. "Striving" also lets the athlete stand in for the audience: you may never dunk, but you can borrow the posture of effort, the story of incremental improvement, the idea that limits are negotiable.
There’s subtext, too, and it’s complicated. By elevating athletes as moral exemplars, the quote participates in a very American habit: converting achievement into character. The risk is obvious in hindsight, in an era of doping scandals, brand-managed vulnerability, and sports-as-content pipelines. When we ask athletes to function as models of "perfection", we also set them up as public disappointments when they inevitably reveal ordinary human messiness.
Contextually, coming from a journalist, this reads less like locker-room sentimentality and more like a media thesis: sports matter because they supply narratives of aspiration that politics and institutions increasingly fail to deliver. It’s a defense of fandom as civic feeling by other means.
The key phrase is "striving for human perfection". Williams doesn’t promise perfection (which would sound delusional); he praises striving, the pursuit itself. That’s a smart rhetorical hedge in a culture that loves winners but distrusts sanctimony. "Striving" also lets the athlete stand in for the audience: you may never dunk, but you can borrow the posture of effort, the story of incremental improvement, the idea that limits are negotiable.
There’s subtext, too, and it’s complicated. By elevating athletes as moral exemplars, the quote participates in a very American habit: converting achievement into character. The risk is obvious in hindsight, in an era of doping scandals, brand-managed vulnerability, and sports-as-content pipelines. When we ask athletes to function as models of "perfection", we also set them up as public disappointments when they inevitably reveal ordinary human messiness.
Contextually, coming from a journalist, this reads less like locker-room sentimentality and more like a media thesis: sports matter because they supply narratives of aspiration that politics and institutions increasingly fail to deliver. It’s a defense of fandom as civic feeling by other means.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Armstrong
Add to List







