"That whose existence is necessary must necessarily be one essence"
About this Quote
Avicenna’s line has the clipped inevitability of a proof because that’s exactly what it is: a trapdoor beneath metaphysical small talk. If something exists necessarily, it can’t be a composite stitched together from parts, properties, or borrowed ingredients. Parts imply dependency; dependency implies contingency. The phrase “must necessarily” isn’t redundancy so much as a tightening of the screws, a way of foreclosing the usual escape hatches where you smuggle in multiplicity and call it “still necessary.”
The intent is theological, but the method is philosophically surgical. Avicenna is building his famous distinction between the necessary existent (wajib al-wujud) and everything else that merely happens to be. “One essence” functions as a kind of ontological minimalism: the necessary being has no internal seams, no admixture of essence and existence the way contingent things do. In his system, that rules out not only plurality but also the idea that God could be a bundle of attributes the way creatures are. Divine attributes become, awkwardly and elegantly, identical with the divine essence.
The subtext is polemical: this is a preemptive strike against rival theologies that multiply eternal principles, against cosmologies with competing ultimates, and against any metaphysics that treats “necessary” as a superpowered version of ordinary existence. Contextually, Avicenna is translating Greek metaphysical machinery (Aristotle filtered through late antique Neoplatonism) into an Islamic intellectual world hungry for rigor. The line works because it turns piety into an inference: unity isn’t proclaimed, it’s derived.
The intent is theological, but the method is philosophically surgical. Avicenna is building his famous distinction between the necessary existent (wajib al-wujud) and everything else that merely happens to be. “One essence” functions as a kind of ontological minimalism: the necessary being has no internal seams, no admixture of essence and existence the way contingent things do. In his system, that rules out not only plurality but also the idea that God could be a bundle of attributes the way creatures are. Divine attributes become, awkwardly and elegantly, identical with the divine essence.
The subtext is polemical: this is a preemptive strike against rival theologies that multiply eternal principles, against cosmologies with competing ultimates, and against any metaphysics that treats “necessary” as a superpowered version of ordinary existence. Contextually, Avicenna is translating Greek metaphysical machinery (Aristotle filtered through late antique Neoplatonism) into an Islamic intellectual world hungry for rigor. The line works because it turns piety into an inference: unity isn’t proclaimed, it’s derived.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Avicenna
Add to List



