"That's a problem. I mean, like any sort of growing startup organization, we are sort of overwhelmed by our growth. And that means we're getting enormous quantity of whistleblower disclosures of a very high caliber, but don't have enough people to actually process and vet this information"
About this Quote
A rare moment of managerial candor dressed up as inevitability: the language of the scrappy startup transplanted onto the moral theater of whistleblowing. Assange frames WikiLeaks not as a crusade but as an operation buckling under “growth,” a word that flatters and excuses at the same time. It suggests success so undeniable it has become a logistical burden, shifting attention from the content of leaks to the infrastructure required to handle them. That’s a convenient repositioning when critics are asking harder questions about judgment, harm, and accountability.
The subtext is a bid for legitimacy through familiar tech-world grammar. “High caliber” and “enormous quantity” function like performance metrics, inviting the audience to see disclosures as product flow and vetting as quality assurance. Even “That’s a problem” is doing double duty: it signals responsibility (we care about process), while also pre-loading an alibi (if something goes wrong, it’s because we were overwhelmed, not reckless).
Context matters: WikiLeaks’ public identity depended on claiming rigor without looking like an intelligence agency. The phrase “process and vet” gestures at professionalism, but it also reveals the precariousness of the enterprise: a small team acting as global gatekeeper, forced to make editorial decisions at speed, under pressure, with real-world consequences. Assange’s intent is to normalize that paradox. He wants admiration for scale and sympathy for strain, turning capacity limits into proof of importance.
The subtext is a bid for legitimacy through familiar tech-world grammar. “High caliber” and “enormous quantity” function like performance metrics, inviting the audience to see disclosures as product flow and vetting as quality assurance. Even “That’s a problem” is doing double duty: it signals responsibility (we care about process), while also pre-loading an alibi (if something goes wrong, it’s because we were overwhelmed, not reckless).
Context matters: WikiLeaks’ public identity depended on claiming rigor without looking like an intelligence agency. The phrase “process and vet” gestures at professionalism, but it also reveals the precariousness of the enterprise: a small team acting as global gatekeeper, forced to make editorial decisions at speed, under pressure, with real-world consequences. Assange’s intent is to normalize that paradox. He wants admiration for scale and sympathy for strain, turning capacity limits into proof of importance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Startup |
|---|
More Quotes by Julian
Add to List


