"That's because international Islamic religious fanatics have the same goal as the Axis fascists - the destruction of our way of life"
About this Quote
He’s reaching for a shortcut the American ear already knows by heart: World War II as the clean, clarifying template for evil. By yoking “international Islamic religious fanatics” to “Axis fascists,” Hackworth collapses a messy, post-Cold War security landscape into a single, morally legible storyline. It’s not primarily an argument about theology or geopolitics; it’s a mobilization tactic. The analogy is meant to do immediate work: harden resolve, simplify motives, and pre-authorize an all-of-society response.
The phrasing is doing quiet but potent framing. “International” smears disparate actors into one coordinated menace. “Fanatics” forecloses negotiation by defining the enemy as irrational. “Our way of life” is the most elastic phrase in the sentence, and that elasticity is the point: it lets listeners pour in whatever they feel is under threat - safety, secularism, consumer normalcy, national pride. It also turns strategy into identity politics, where dissent can be painted as softness toward an existential foe.
Context matters. Hackworth, a soldier shaped by mid-century total war and later by Vietnam’s credibility gap, speaks from a culture that prizes moral clarity and distrusts half-measures. The Axis comparison borrows the emotional architecture of “the Good War” to re-legitimize open-ended conflict after the uncertainties of insurgency and terrorism. The subtext is a warning against treating jihadist violence as crime or grievance. Treat it as fascism, he implies, and the only responsible posture is confrontation, not comprehension. That rhetorical move is powerful - and perilous - because it trades precision for unanimity.
The phrasing is doing quiet but potent framing. “International” smears disparate actors into one coordinated menace. “Fanatics” forecloses negotiation by defining the enemy as irrational. “Our way of life” is the most elastic phrase in the sentence, and that elasticity is the point: it lets listeners pour in whatever they feel is under threat - safety, secularism, consumer normalcy, national pride. It also turns strategy into identity politics, where dissent can be painted as softness toward an existential foe.
Context matters. Hackworth, a soldier shaped by mid-century total war and later by Vietnam’s credibility gap, speaks from a culture that prizes moral clarity and distrusts half-measures. The Axis comparison borrows the emotional architecture of “the Good War” to re-legitimize open-ended conflict after the uncertainties of insurgency and terrorism. The subtext is a warning against treating jihadist violence as crime or grievance. Treat it as fascism, he implies, and the only responsible posture is confrontation, not comprehension. That rhetorical move is powerful - and perilous - because it trades precision for unanimity.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
