"That's true but I think the contemporary problem that we are facing increasing numbers of black people and other people of color being thrown into a status that involves work in alternative economies and increasing numbers of people who are incarcerated"
About this Quote
Davis is doing something deft here: she refuses the comforting fiction that mass incarceration is just “crime” and insists we see it as labor policy by other means. The phrase “status” matters. It suggests a caste-like destination rather than an individual misstep, a social slot manufactured for “increasing numbers of black people and other people of color.” Her grammar piles up people the way institutions do: not as citizens with stories, but as populations to be managed.
“Alternative economies” is her most surgical euphemism. It can mean informal work, underground markets, precarious hustles, survival strategies that bloom when formal employment is withheld or made inaccessible. Davis doesn’t romanticize it; she frames it as the predictable outcome of exclusion. The subtext is that the state helps create the conditions it later punishes: disinvestment, unemployment, criminalization, then cages.
She links these tracks - informal labor and incarceration - as parallel funnels. One disciplines people through instability; the other through confinement. Both extract value. In the background is Davis’s long critique of the prison-industrial complex: prisons as a growth industry, as political theater, as a repository for surplus labor in a deindustrialized economy. Read in that context, her “contemporary problem” isn’t a spike in wrongdoing; it’s the normalization of containment as governance.
The intent is strategic: to shift the debate from morality to structure. If incarceration is framed as a symptom of economic design and racial management, then reform isn’t a tweak to sentencing. It’s a demand to rebuild the economy that decides who gets work, who gets punished, and who gets erased.
“Alternative economies” is her most surgical euphemism. It can mean informal work, underground markets, precarious hustles, survival strategies that bloom when formal employment is withheld or made inaccessible. Davis doesn’t romanticize it; she frames it as the predictable outcome of exclusion. The subtext is that the state helps create the conditions it later punishes: disinvestment, unemployment, criminalization, then cages.
She links these tracks - informal labor and incarceration - as parallel funnels. One disciplines people through instability; the other through confinement. Both extract value. In the background is Davis’s long critique of the prison-industrial complex: prisons as a growth industry, as political theater, as a repository for surplus labor in a deindustrialized economy. Read in that context, her “contemporary problem” isn’t a spike in wrongdoing; it’s the normalization of containment as governance.
The intent is strategic: to shift the debate from morality to structure. If incarceration is framed as a symptom of economic design and racial management, then reform isn’t a tweak to sentencing. It’s a demand to rebuild the economy that decides who gets work, who gets punished, and who gets erased.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Angela
Add to List

