"The act of voting by ordinary Iraqis in the face of extreme danger confirms President Bush's belief that people around the globe, when given a chance, will choose liberty and democracy over enslavement and tyranny"
About this Quote
It turns Iraqi voters into living proof-of-concept for an American project that, by the time John Ensign is praising it, badly needs proof. The sentence isn’t really about Iraqis as political agents; it’s about stabilizing an argument back home: that President Bush’s war-and-democracy thesis remains morally coherent despite the carnage. “In the face of extreme danger” does double duty: it honors courage while laundering responsibility, treating violence as a backdrop rather than as a condition produced, in part, by invasion and state collapse.
The key maneuver is the word “confirms.” Ensign frames a messy, contingent event - people voting for dozens of reasons, including sectarian power, local patronage, fear, hope, and survival - as a simple referendum on American ideology. Iraq becomes a stage where “ordinary” citizens audition for a role in a familiar U.S. narrative: freedom-seekers awaiting their chance. That phrase, “when given a chance,” quietly recenters agency with the giver. Iraqis choose, but only after Washington grants the opportunity.
The moral architecture is stark: “liberty and democracy” versus “enslavement and tyranny.” It’s not analysis; it’s a binary designed to discipline doubt. If voting equals “liberty,” then skepticism about the war reads as skepticism about liberty itself. In that context - early elections amid insurgency, rising casualties, and domestic American unease - the line functions as political insulation: a valorization of Iraqi bravery deployed to validate U.S. strategy, and to convert a single democratic ritual into a sweeping verdict on history.
The key maneuver is the word “confirms.” Ensign frames a messy, contingent event - people voting for dozens of reasons, including sectarian power, local patronage, fear, hope, and survival - as a simple referendum on American ideology. Iraq becomes a stage where “ordinary” citizens audition for a role in a familiar U.S. narrative: freedom-seekers awaiting their chance. That phrase, “when given a chance,” quietly recenters agency with the giver. Iraqis choose, but only after Washington grants the opportunity.
The moral architecture is stark: “liberty and democracy” versus “enslavement and tyranny.” It’s not analysis; it’s a binary designed to discipline doubt. If voting equals “liberty,” then skepticism about the war reads as skepticism about liberty itself. In that context - early elections amid insurgency, rising casualties, and domestic American unease - the line functions as political insulation: a valorization of Iraqi bravery deployed to validate U.S. strategy, and to convert a single democratic ritual into a sweeping verdict on history.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List





