"The Administration should never have walked away from the Kyoto Treaty. Global warming is real and it is here today. The facts aren't the issue. The policy is the issue. I think the Administration's policy on global warming is dead wrong"
About this Quote
Kulongoski’s line lands like a rebuke delivered in the calm, procedural language of governance, which is exactly why it stings. He isn’t trying to “raise awareness” about climate change; he’s trying to corner an administration that, in his telling, has already lost the argument on reality. “Global warming is real and it is here today” isn’t a plea for belief so much as a declaration that the cultural fight over facts is a distraction tactics have been built around. He then snaps the frame shut: “The facts aren’t the issue. The policy is the issue.” That pivot is the quote’s real engine.
The subtext is strategic: if the science is settled enough to treat as background, then refusing Kyoto stops looking like prudence and starts looking like ideology, capture, or negligence. “Walked away” implies abandonment of responsibility and international partnership, not simply a policy disagreement. Kyoto becomes shorthand for a broader choice: engage in multilateral constraints and domestic reforms, or protect short-term economic and political coalitions by delaying action.
Contextually, this reads as early-2000s Democratic governance rhetoric aimed at the George W. Bush era, when the U.S. rejection of Kyoto symbolized an assertive skepticism toward global climate agreements. Kulongoski positions himself as the adult in the room: he concedes no ground on the empirical, so the only legitimate debate left is what leaders are willing to do. The closing phrase, “dead wrong,” is deliberately plainspoken. It’s not a technocratic critique; it’s a moral verdict dressed in policy clothes.
The subtext is strategic: if the science is settled enough to treat as background, then refusing Kyoto stops looking like prudence and starts looking like ideology, capture, or negligence. “Walked away” implies abandonment of responsibility and international partnership, not simply a policy disagreement. Kyoto becomes shorthand for a broader choice: engage in multilateral constraints and domestic reforms, or protect short-term economic and political coalitions by delaying action.
Contextually, this reads as early-2000s Democratic governance rhetoric aimed at the George W. Bush era, when the U.S. rejection of Kyoto symbolized an assertive skepticism toward global climate agreements. Kulongoski positions himself as the adult in the room: he concedes no ground on the empirical, so the only legitimate debate left is what leaders are willing to do. The closing phrase, “dead wrong,” is deliberately plainspoken. It’s not a technocratic critique; it’s a moral verdict dressed in policy clothes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ted
Add to List

