"The aggregation of large fortunes is not at all a thing to be regretted"
About this Quote
The intent lands in the Gilded Age argument over whether industrial titans were builders of progress or architects of extraction. Sumner, a leading voice of laissez-faire and Social Darwinist thinking, treats private fortune as a public signal: proof that the system is working, that talent and discipline have been correctly rewarded. The subtext is a warning to reformers. If you regret big fortunes, you’re not just criticizing individuals; you’re questioning the legitimacy of the competitive order that produced them. And that, to Sumner, risks weakening the moral spine of capitalism itself.
What makes the line rhetorically effective is its inversion of expected ethics. Most moral frameworks treat excess as suspect; Sumner flips it into a civic non-issue. Notice what goes unsaid: how fortunes are made, who absorbs the costs, what happens when wealth becomes power. The sentence invites you to skip those questions, to treat concentration as incidental, even beneficial, and to feel sophisticated for not flinching.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wealth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Sumner, William Graham. (n.d.). The aggregation of large fortunes is not at all a thing to be regretted. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-aggregation-of-large-fortunes-is-not-at-all-a-108291/
Chicago Style
Sumner, William Graham. "The aggregation of large fortunes is not at all a thing to be regretted." FixQuotes. Accessed February 2, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-aggregation-of-large-fortunes-is-not-at-all-a-108291/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The aggregation of large fortunes is not at all a thing to be regretted." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-aggregation-of-large-fortunes-is-not-at-all-a-108291/. Accessed 2 Feb. 2026.










