"The argument for getting our own house in order is not an argument for turning our back on the world. We cannot and should not do that"
About this Quote
Chris Christie draws a sharp line between prudent self-renewal and retreat. Getting our house in order means restoring fiscal discipline, repairing institutions, improving infrastructure, strengthening education and workforce capacity, and lowering political temperature so government can function. It is the foundation of credibility. But he refuses the common slide from that premise to isolationism, the idea that because we have problems at home we should disengage abroad.
The argument is both strategic and moral. Strategically, a prosperous, coherent United States is better able to shape rules, deter aggression, and protect supply chains. Disengagement invites rivals to fill vacuums, and the costs find their way back home as conflict, energy shocks, cyber threats, and lost markets. Morally, a nation with democratic aspirations should not avert its eyes from genocide, authoritarian expansion, or the needs of allies who rely on commitments America made in calmer times.
The context is a Republican Party wrestling with a post-9/11 hangover and a surge of America First sentiment. Voters are weary of long wars and skeptical of globalization. Christie tries to hold two truths: the country cannot forever outsource the bill for domestic neglect, and it cannot abdicate leadership without endangering its own security and prosperity. The phrase cannot and should not signals necessity and duty, not mere preference.
History supports the synthesis he is urging. After World War II, the United States rebuilt domestically while launching the Marshall Plan and NATO, recognizing that internal vitality and outward engagement reinforce each other. The same logic applies to contemporary challenges from China and Russia to pandemics, climate, and technology standards. The path he outlines is neither endless intervention nor anxious withdrawal, but a disciplined recommitment at home that enables reliable, measured involvement abroad. Renewal is the means; engagement remains the responsibility.
The argument is both strategic and moral. Strategically, a prosperous, coherent United States is better able to shape rules, deter aggression, and protect supply chains. Disengagement invites rivals to fill vacuums, and the costs find their way back home as conflict, energy shocks, cyber threats, and lost markets. Morally, a nation with democratic aspirations should not avert its eyes from genocide, authoritarian expansion, or the needs of allies who rely on commitments America made in calmer times.
The context is a Republican Party wrestling with a post-9/11 hangover and a surge of America First sentiment. Voters are weary of long wars and skeptical of globalization. Christie tries to hold two truths: the country cannot forever outsource the bill for domestic neglect, and it cannot abdicate leadership without endangering its own security and prosperity. The phrase cannot and should not signals necessity and duty, not mere preference.
History supports the synthesis he is urging. After World War II, the United States rebuilt domestically while launching the Marshall Plan and NATO, recognizing that internal vitality and outward engagement reinforce each other. The same logic applies to contemporary challenges from China and Russia to pandemics, climate, and technology standards. The path he outlines is neither endless intervention nor anxious withdrawal, but a disciplined recommitment at home that enables reliable, measured involvement abroad. Renewal is the means; engagement remains the responsibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Chris
Add to List




