"The attitude of insolent haughtiness is characteristic of the relationships Americans form with what is alien to them, with others"
About this Quote
“Insolent haughtiness” lands like a slap because Saramago gives arrogance both a sneer and a posture: it’s not merely ignorance, it’s ignorance with swagger. The line is built to indict a habit of power masquerading as personality. “Attitude” makes it behavioral, almost casual; “characteristic” makes it systemic. He’s not diagnosing a few bad actors, he’s describing a national reflex that presents itself as normal.
The target is “relationships,” not policy. That shift matters. Saramago is pointing to the everyday micro-diplomacy of empire: how a dominant culture meets the unfamiliar with a confidence that assumes it will be accommodated. “What is alien” is deliberately broad - immigrants, foreign governments, other languages, other histories - but the phrasing also suggests a failure of imagination. The “alien” isn’t inherently strange; it’s rendered strange by the American gaze. He’s critiquing a worldview that turns difference into a test of loyalty or usefulness.
As a novelist who watched the 20th century’s ideological wreckage and the late century’s American ascendancy, Saramago is writing from the outside of the superpower’s self-mythology. The subtext is that soft power works not only through Hollywood and markets, but through a tone: the assumption that the rest of the world is a backdrop, an audience, or a problem to be managed. The insult in the sentence is strategic. It refuses to flatter American self-conceptions of openness, forcing readers to confront how often “curiosity” is performed as domination with better branding.
The target is “relationships,” not policy. That shift matters. Saramago is pointing to the everyday micro-diplomacy of empire: how a dominant culture meets the unfamiliar with a confidence that assumes it will be accommodated. “What is alien” is deliberately broad - immigrants, foreign governments, other languages, other histories - but the phrasing also suggests a failure of imagination. The “alien” isn’t inherently strange; it’s rendered strange by the American gaze. He’s critiquing a worldview that turns difference into a test of loyalty or usefulness.
As a novelist who watched the 20th century’s ideological wreckage and the late century’s American ascendancy, Saramago is writing from the outside of the superpower’s self-mythology. The subtext is that soft power works not only through Hollywood and markets, but through a tone: the assumption that the rest of the world is a backdrop, an audience, or a problem to be managed. The insult in the sentence is strategic. It refuses to flatter American self-conceptions of openness, forcing readers to confront how often “curiosity” is performed as domination with better branding.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jose
Add to List











