"The average trade of an individual is in the thousands of shares, whereas the institutional trade can be in the millions of shares. Clearly, the bigger the order, the bigger the move in the stock"
About this Quote
Bartiromo’s line is doing two jobs at once: it’s a primer for the retail audience watching markets like a spectator sport, and it’s a subtle reminder of who actually moves the scoreboard. By putting “thousands” next to “millions,” she doesn’t just quantify scale; she dramatizes hierarchy. The rhetorical trick is simple and effective: make the imbalance so obvious that “clearly” feels earned, as if market power were a law of physics rather than a product of structure.
The intent is explanatory, but the subtext is political economy. “Bigger order, bigger move” sounds like neutral mechanics, yet it smuggles in a worldview where price is less a reflection of collective wisdom and more the footprint of concentrated capital. That matters because the modern market is sold to the public as democratized - apps, access, “everyone can invest.” Bartiromo’s framing quietly punctures that romance: yes, you can participate, but participation isn’t the same as influence.
Contextually, this lands in an era when institutional flows, algorithmic execution, and liquidity dynamics often dominate day-to-day price action. It also speaks to a post-2008 sensibility: suspicion that markets aren’t just volatile but steered. Her choice of “average trade” is telling, too - it normalizes retail smallness as a baseline, then positions institutions as the exceptional force. The takeaway isn’t merely market education; it’s a recalibration of agency. Retail traders can ride waves, but institutions make weather.
The intent is explanatory, but the subtext is political economy. “Bigger order, bigger move” sounds like neutral mechanics, yet it smuggles in a worldview where price is less a reflection of collective wisdom and more the footprint of concentrated capital. That matters because the modern market is sold to the public as democratized - apps, access, “everyone can invest.” Bartiromo’s framing quietly punctures that romance: yes, you can participate, but participation isn’t the same as influence.
Contextually, this lands in an era when institutional flows, algorithmic execution, and liquidity dynamics often dominate day-to-day price action. It also speaks to a post-2008 sensibility: suspicion that markets aren’t just volatile but steered. Her choice of “average trade” is telling, too - it normalizes retail smallness as a baseline, then positions institutions as the exceptional force. The takeaway isn’t merely market education; it’s a recalibration of agency. Retail traders can ride waves, but institutions make weather.
Quote Details
| Topic | Investment |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Maria
Add to List

