"The basic drive behind real philosophy is curiosity about the world, not interest in the writings of philosophers"
About this Quote
Magee draws a sharp line between philosophy as a living impulse and philosophy as a credentialed pastime. The sentence is engineered to prick the academic bubble: “real philosophy” is a provocation, a gate swung open for outsiders and swung shut on a certain kind of insider. He doesn’t deny that philosophers’ texts matter; he demotes them from destination to instrument. The primary object of attention, he insists, is the world itself - the mess of perception, knowledge, ethics, meaning - not the self-referential library where philosophers argue about what other philosophers meant.
The subtext is a warning about professionalization. When a discipline is housed in universities, it tends to grow incentives that reward commentary, lineage, and interpretive virtuosity. The scholar who can thread Hume through Kant into Wittgenstein often outranks the person who asks the embarrassing, blunt question that started the whole tradition in the first place. Magee is calling that bluff. He’s defending philosophy’s original posture: not reverence, but suspicion; not mastery of a canon, but a refusal to stop wondering.
Context matters because Magee was a rare public intellectual in Britain: a broadcaster and writer who treated philosophy as something you could do with your ordinary mind, not just study with specialized tools. His line flatters the beginner, but it also indicts a culture where reading becomes a substitute for thinking. At its best, the quote functions like a reset button: if your philosophical work doesn’t increase your curiosity about reality, it may be literature about philosophy rather than philosophy itself.
The subtext is a warning about professionalization. When a discipline is housed in universities, it tends to grow incentives that reward commentary, lineage, and interpretive virtuosity. The scholar who can thread Hume through Kant into Wittgenstein often outranks the person who asks the embarrassing, blunt question that started the whole tradition in the first place. Magee is calling that bluff. He’s defending philosophy’s original posture: not reverence, but suspicion; not mastery of a canon, but a refusal to stop wondering.
Context matters because Magee was a rare public intellectual in Britain: a broadcaster and writer who treated philosophy as something you could do with your ordinary mind, not just study with specialized tools. His line flatters the beginner, but it also indicts a culture where reading becomes a substitute for thinking. At its best, the quote functions like a reset button: if your philosophical work doesn’t increase your curiosity about reality, it may be literature about philosophy rather than philosophy itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Bryan
Add to List
