"The basic fault lines today are not between people with different beliefs but between people who hold these beliefs with an element of uncertainty and people who hold these beliefs with a pretense of certitude"
About this Quote
Berger redraws the culture-war map with a sociologist's favorite weapon: a category shift. The real divide, he argues, isn't creed versus creed but temperament versus temperament - the humble mind versus the armored one. It's a subtle, slightly damning move. By treating "belief" as a given (everyone has some), he relocates conflict to the style of believing. Certitude becomes less a virtue than a social performance: a "pretense" that suggests theater, strategy, and status-seeking as much as conviction.
The line lands because it names something modern audiences recognize: the way ideological identity hardens under pressure. In pluralistic societies, competing worldviews bump shoulders daily, and the old hope was that exposure would soften edges. Berger implies the opposite can happen. Uncertainty becomes a mark of sophistication or psychological realism, while certitude becomes a coping mechanism - a way to simplify complexity into a moral binary that travels well in politics, media, and religious life.
Context matters: Berger spent his career studying how modernity doesn't neatly secularize the world; it multiplies options, and options produce anxiety. That helps explain the subtext here: doubt isn't just epistemic, it's civic. People who can hold beliefs with "an element of uncertainty" can coexist; they can bargain, compromise, and revise. People who must project absolute certainty can't risk that flexibility without feeling like they're dissolving. Berger's point isn't that truth is impossible, but that democracy becomes impossible when certainty turns into a posture no one is allowed to question.
The line lands because it names something modern audiences recognize: the way ideological identity hardens under pressure. In pluralistic societies, competing worldviews bump shoulders daily, and the old hope was that exposure would soften edges. Berger implies the opposite can happen. Uncertainty becomes a mark of sophistication or psychological realism, while certitude becomes a coping mechanism - a way to simplify complexity into a moral binary that travels well in politics, media, and religious life.
Context matters: Berger spent his career studying how modernity doesn't neatly secularize the world; it multiplies options, and options produce anxiety. That helps explain the subtext here: doubt isn't just epistemic, it's civic. People who can hold beliefs with "an element of uncertainty" can coexist; they can bargain, compromise, and revise. People who must project absolute certainty can't risk that flexibility without feeling like they're dissolving. Berger's point isn't that truth is impossible, but that democracy becomes impossible when certainty turns into a posture no one is allowed to question.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List
