"The beauty of a strong, lasting commitment is often best understood by men incapable of it"
About this Quote
Kempton lands the line like a flicked match: small, bright, and quietly accusatory. As a journalist with a feel for moral theater, he’s diagnosing a familiar American type - the man who can talk eloquently about loyalty, marriage, duty, country, even craft, while reliably dodging the daily disciplines that make any of those things real. The sting is in the asymmetry: “best understood” doesn’t mean practiced. It means admired from a safe distance, the way an art critic might praise a cathedral he could never build.
The subtext is less about ignorance than about longing. Incapacity can sharpen perception. The man who can’t commit is often the one most haunted by what commitment promises: continuity, a stable self, the kind of earned intimacy that can’t be improvised. Kempton suggests that the speechifying about “commitment” we hear from certain quarters isn’t hypocrisy so much as displaced reverence - a tribute paid in words because payment in behavior is impossible.
Context matters: Kempton wrote in a 20th-century world where masculine freedom was routinely framed as sophistication and where institutions (marriage, politics, civic life) were sold as noble while being treated as optional by those with the most permission to opt out. The line skewers that privilege. It also cuts closer: the people least able to keep faith may be the most fluent in its beauty because they’ve had to aestheticize what they can’t sustain. Admiration becomes a consolation prize, and rhetoric becomes a substitute for character.
The subtext is less about ignorance than about longing. Incapacity can sharpen perception. The man who can’t commit is often the one most haunted by what commitment promises: continuity, a stable self, the kind of earned intimacy that can’t be improvised. Kempton suggests that the speechifying about “commitment” we hear from certain quarters isn’t hypocrisy so much as displaced reverence - a tribute paid in words because payment in behavior is impossible.
Context matters: Kempton wrote in a 20th-century world where masculine freedom was routinely framed as sophistication and where institutions (marriage, politics, civic life) were sold as noble while being treated as optional by those with the most permission to opt out. The line skewers that privilege. It also cuts closer: the people least able to keep faith may be the most fluent in its beauty because they’ve had to aestheticize what they can’t sustain. Admiration becomes a consolation prize, and rhetoric becomes a substitute for character.
Quote Details
| Topic | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Murray
Add to List






