"The best project is one that asks a novel question"
About this Quote
In science, the real flex is not the fanciest technique or the biggest dataset; its the audacity to ask something nobody has cleanly framed before. Walter Gilbert - a Nobel-winning biochemist who helped catalyze modern molecular biology and genomics - is pointing at a quiet truth of research culture: most projects are optimized for answers, not questions. Funding panels, paper pipelines, and career timelines reward what looks feasible. Gilbert is arguing that the highest-value work often starts earlier, at the level of reframing.
The intent is both practical and provocative. A "novel question" is a filter against busywork: if the question is genuinely new, the project has a chance to generate new concepts, not just new measurements. Subtext: novelty is not a garnish; its the engine. You can polish methods endlessly and still produce incrementalism if the underlying question is inherited, stale, or merely fashionable. The quote also carries a warning about scientific mimicry - labs chasing the same targets because the incentives are aligned, not because the unknowns are.
Context matters here: Gilbert came up in an era when biology repeatedly leapt forward by inventing new questions - not just how genes work, but how to read them, how to edit them, how to scale that reading to whole genomes. Those revolutions were less about having an answer ready and more about recognizing that the old questions were too small. The line is deceptively simple because it smuggles in a radical standard: judge a project by the quality of its curiosity, not the certainty of its outcome.
The intent is both practical and provocative. A "novel question" is a filter against busywork: if the question is genuinely new, the project has a chance to generate new concepts, not just new measurements. Subtext: novelty is not a garnish; its the engine. You can polish methods endlessly and still produce incrementalism if the underlying question is inherited, stale, or merely fashionable. The quote also carries a warning about scientific mimicry - labs chasing the same targets because the incentives are aligned, not because the unknowns are.
Context matters here: Gilbert came up in an era when biology repeatedly leapt forward by inventing new questions - not just how genes work, but how to read them, how to edit them, how to scale that reading to whole genomes. Those revolutions were less about having an answer ready and more about recognizing that the old questions were too small. The line is deceptively simple because it smuggles in a radical standard: judge a project by the quality of its curiosity, not the certainty of its outcome.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Walter
Add to List






