"The best source for finding an agent is called Literary Agents of North America. It's a complete list of agents, not only by name and address, but by type of book they represent and by what their submission criteria are"
About this Quote
Paretsky is doing something deceptively radical here: demystifying a gatekept industry with the plainest possible tool - a directory. No romance of discovery, no genius-is-recognized myth, just the unglamorous infrastructure of publishing laid bare. The line reads like practical advice, but the intent is cultural: to shift power toward writers by naming the system and handing them the map.
The subtext is an author’s weary familiarity with how opaque the agent hunt can be, especially for newcomers who don’t already have the right MFA cohort, conference circuit, or insider introductions. By stressing “complete list,” Paretsky pushes back against the idea that access is earned through mystique. The specificity - “type of book they represent” and “submission criteria” - underlines that publishing is less a singular monolith than a patchwork of tastes, market niches, and preferences. Translation: you’re not failing because you’re talentless; you may be knocking on the wrong doors.
Context matters. Paretsky came up in an era when literary networking was even more analog and exclusionary, and her own career in crime fiction sits at a crossroads of commercial and literary respectability. That vantage point makes her advice feel like a small act of solidarity: treat your work as a professional product, research the market, respect the boundaries agents set, and demand clarity in return. It’s also an implicit rebuke to predatory middlemen and vanity pipelines that flourish when writers lack reliable information.
The quote works because it swaps mythology for logistics - and in publishing, logistics is often where dreams either quietly die or finally get routed to the right person.
The subtext is an author’s weary familiarity with how opaque the agent hunt can be, especially for newcomers who don’t already have the right MFA cohort, conference circuit, or insider introductions. By stressing “complete list,” Paretsky pushes back against the idea that access is earned through mystique. The specificity - “type of book they represent” and “submission criteria” - underlines that publishing is less a singular monolith than a patchwork of tastes, market niches, and preferences. Translation: you’re not failing because you’re talentless; you may be knocking on the wrong doors.
Context matters. Paretsky came up in an era when literary networking was even more analog and exclusionary, and her own career in crime fiction sits at a crossroads of commercial and literary respectability. That vantage point makes her advice feel like a small act of solidarity: treat your work as a professional product, research the market, respect the boundaries agents set, and demand clarity in return. It’s also an implicit rebuke to predatory middlemen and vanity pipelines that flourish when writers lack reliable information.
The quote works because it swaps mythology for logistics - and in publishing, logistics is often where dreams either quietly die or finally get routed to the right person.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Sara
Add to List




